-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: benchmark 8 spec #1230
feat: benchmark 8 spec #1230
Conversation
DocumentationBuild SystemContinuous Integration
Bug Fixes
Tests
Code Refactoring
ContributorsCommit-Lint commandsYou can trigger Commit-Lint actions by commenting on this PR:
|
Allow equation numbering and bibtex citations in noteobok
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
@tkphd this is the first draft of BM8. I probably need to modify it again if the paper has changed. I won't merge this until the paper goes to pre-print, but wanted to check that all the tests passed in a PR. Also, we can test the upload guidelines when I get the BM8 results pages sorted in a separate PR |
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
@wuwenkun, please review this when you get a chance, I've compared with your latest overleaf version and it seems pretty good. Some of the ordering is a little different, but I'm not sure that matters. |
@wuwenkun, this is the link for the notebook rendered on the website, https://random-cat-1230.surge.sh/benchmarks/benchmark8.ipynb/ and the link if you want to make changes to the notebook, https://github.com/wd15/pfhub/blob/issue1208-bm8/benchmarks/benchmark8.ipynb |
@tkphd, could you take a look at this again. Also, feel free to say "no" to this if you can't face looking at this problem again. Thanks. |
It's a great problem! Happy to look! |
Twitter # link is a bit stupid and useless.
Htmlproofer doesn't work with Twitter links don't work on the CI
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
Is a new reference available? The link labeled "Phase Field Benchmark Problems for Nucleation" goes to the dendritic growth paper. |
I noted above. Maybe mark it in your review. It would be nice if there were better review mechanisms on github for notebooks. The PR renders the notebook and reviewer would mark directly at the side of the notebook. |
I'll try and get that setup or look into how to use it. It's on my list of things. |
@tkphd, can you see this? https://app.reviewnb.com/wd15/pfhub/blob/issue1208-bm8/benchmarks%2Fbenchmark8.ipynb I have no idea if you can. This is the "pull request" view: https://app.reviewnb.com/usnistgov/pfhub/pull/1230/. It only seems to show the diff not the section for reviewing the notebook. |
Yep! I can see it, and got notified. Cool! |
It's a vast improvement. Opens reviews up to more people. |
I have no idea who has permissions to comment on that notebook. |
@wuwenkun, can you see this and comment to test it? https://app.reviewnb.com/wd15/pfhub/blob/issue1208-bm8/benchmarks%2Fbenchmark8.ipynb |
Hi Daniel, I have added my comments to the review notebook. Could you see my comments there? |
Yes, all good. Thanks! |
Make simulations 4 and 5 optional in BM8a
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
1 similar comment
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
Very minor changes requested on reviewnb. Looks pretty good! |
Use wd15's version of notebook-extensions not Calysto's, which does not have the correct modifications.
Update benchmark8 after tkphd's review - Use Y instead of X for the solid fraction - More explicit that data can be stored externally to the website and also on the website's own storage - Don't spedify the ordering of the \Delta x's. Hopefully, the website will be able to figure this out - Fix grammer - Fix broken URLs for references.
Code for particle counts was not previously shown unless the code toggle button was pressed on the website. Now the code is in a markdown cell so will always be on the website.
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
@tkphd: made modifications suggested. Note that Reviewnb is now posting a link into this PR to their version of the PR and allowing comments in the version of the notebook rendered on their PR site, which is really nice. Reviewnb is getting better. |
Yeah! They were very responsive to a spellcheck issue I opened, looks like an active project. Very cool. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
Suggestion for @wuwenkun: if you create an arXiv record for the preprint, we can link to that until it clears peer review & publication.
Link to nucleation paper was broken.
It's already out. I fixed the link to it in the notebook. |
The new PFHub live website is ready for review. |
Full implementation of benchmark 8
Address #1208
Includes
This is really a draft as the submission guidelines may need to change based on some test uploads. The actual benchmark 8 landing page is not yet functional for this set of submission guidelines.
TODO
Remember to tear down the live site when merging or closing this
pull request.
This change is