Skip to content

Conversation

@chrisjsewell
Copy link
Member

import_prefix_link_edit function now takes an iterable of link field names rather than a list of link option dictionaries, allowing it to work with any set of link fields provided by the schema rather than being tied to the configuration.

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell requested a review from ubmarco December 24, 2025 11:33
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.24%. Comparing base (4e10030) to head (0fba0f0).
⚠️ Report is 222 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1615      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.87%   88.24%   +1.36%     
==========================================
  Files          56       70      +14     
  Lines        6532     9930    +3398     
==========================================
+ Hits         5675     8763    +3088     
- Misses        857     1167     +310     
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 88.24% <100.00%> (+1.36%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell merged commit 4404a93 into master Dec 30, 2025
21 checks passed
@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell deleted the import_prefix_link_edit-change branch December 30, 2025 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants