Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nightly test new CI image #115

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 2, 2020
Merged

Conversation

TriplEight
Copy link
Contributor

@TriplEight TriplEight commented Dec 1, 2020

Put the image name into a var so it can be changed by an upstream pipeline trigger.

Companion PR: paritytech/scripts#238

@TriplEight TriplEight added the ci something to do with continious integration label Dec 1, 2020
@TriplEight TriplEight self-assigned this Dec 1, 2020
@@ -52,7 +48,6 @@ workflow:
- if: $CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE == "schedule"
- if: $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME == "master"
- if: $CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME == "tags"
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What does it imply that this variable is removed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nothing really, it's supposed to launch CI pipelines on every branch which is not desirable, we run the usual pipelines only on PR branches, it's covered by the next line. Besides, branches other than PR ones are not getting mirrored to GitLab.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ascjones ascjones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@TriplEight TriplEight merged commit 18ce1e1 into master Dec 2, 2020
@cmichi cmichi deleted the dp_nightly_test_new_ci_image branch December 2, 2020 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci something to do with continious integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants