Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relax the inline style validation in expectations #253

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2019

Conversation

sunesimonsen
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

I don't think our current regex is anywhere near smart enough to recognize all
valid style values. So I'm going to relax the validation.
@sunesimonsen
Copy link
Member Author

I'm just going to merge this PR as I don't consider it controversial and it was me who introduced the check in the first place.

@sunesimonsen sunesimonsen force-pushed the ssimonsen/relax-style-validation branch from 3e5e6e2 to 94f5801 Compare February 20, 2019 20:39
It seems like some default eslint configuration has changed when run with the
latest dependencies that matches our ranges.

I changed the tactic to make assigning to the global document in the test a bit
more explicit.
@sunesimonsen sunesimonsen merged commit 0baa80e into master Feb 20, 2019
@sunesimonsen sunesimonsen deleted the ssimonsen/relax-style-validation branch February 20, 2019 20:57
@sunesimonsen sunesimonsen changed the title Relax the inly style validation in expectations Relax the inline style validation in expectations Feb 20, 2019
sunesimonsen added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
…ation

Relax the inline style validation in expectations
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 21, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1003

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-69.4%) to 22.126%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 995: -69.4%
Covered Lines: 1586
Relevant Lines: 7168

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants