Implemented diff for 'to have attributes' + to have class(es) assertion #14
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
There are parts in here I don't quite get. Probably since I haven't been massaging custom output before and haven't followed along with the promises implementation in unexpected. Looks good though, so I'll merge |
Munter
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 4, 2015
Implemented diff for 'to have attributes' + to have class(es) assertion
|
Published in v0.8.0 |
Yeah, when you cannot delegate directly to |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
/cc @sunesimonsen who came up with the idea of doing the diff like this.
Next thing I'd like to look into is a
to satisfyforHTMLElement, but this PR is already too big.