Skip to content

Adjustment to obsolete methods in ContentValueSetValidator #15153

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bjarnef
Copy link
Contributor

@bjarnef bjarnef commented Nov 6, 2023

Prerequisites

  • I have added steps to test this contribution in the description below

Description

Related to #15135

I think https://github.com/umbraco/Umbraco-CMS/pull/14424/files marked it obsolete as the ctor is removed later and replaced by Infrastructure.Scoping.IScopeProvider and there isn't any easy way to convert/cast from Umbraco.Cms.Core.Scoping.IScopeProvider to Umbraco.Cms.Infrastructure.Scoping.IScopeProvider, so it introduce a breaking change in a major version instead.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Hi there @bjarnef, thank you for this contribution! 👍

While we wait for one of the Core Collaborators team to have a look at your work, we wanted to let you know about that we have a checklist for some of the things we will consider during review:

  • It's clear what problem this is solving, there's a connected issue or a description of what the changes do and how to test them
  • The automated tests all pass (see "Checks" tab on this PR)
  • The level of security for this contribution is the same or improved
  • The level of performance for this contribution is the same or improved
  • Avoids creating breaking changes; note that behavioral changes might also be perceived as breaking
  • If this is a new feature, Umbraco HQ provided guidance on the implementation beforehand
  • 💡 The contribution looks original and the contributor is presumably allowed to share it

Don't worry if you got something wrong. We like to think of a pull request as the start of a conversation, we're happy to provide guidance on improving your contribution.

If you realize that you might want to make some changes then you can do that by adding new commits to the branch you created for this work and pushing new commits. They should then automatically show up as updates to this pull request.

Thanks, from your friendly Umbraco GitHub bot 🤖 🙂

@bjarnef bjarnef changed the title Adjustment to obsolete methods in ContentvValueSetValidator Adjustment to obsolete methods in ContentValueSetValidator Nov 6, 2023
@georgebid
Copy link
Contributor

And thank you for this one too! 💯 Someone will review this PR soon.

@emmagarland
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @bjarnef

Sorry its been so long, before we look at this one is this still relevant in v14 now?

Thanks,

Emma

@bjarnef
Copy link
Contributor Author

bjarnef commented Mar 2, 2025

It seems to obsolete attribute was added in v14 here:
#14424

and removal in v16:
#18074

@nul800sebastiaan nul800sebastiaan changed the base branch from contrib to main May 5, 2025 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants