Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various fixes from #1907 #1943

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 7, 2017
Merged

Various fixes from #1907 #1943

merged 7 commits into from
Sep 7, 2017

Conversation

bilke
Copy link
Member

@bilke bilke commented Sep 7, 2017

To cleanup #1907 a little bit...

Copy link
Member

@endJunction endJunction left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine!

@bilke bilke merged commit b38d19b into ufz:master Sep 7, 2017
@bilke bilke deleted the various-fixes2 branch September 7, 2017 20:23
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
[submodule "Tests/Data"]
path = Tests/Data
url = https://github.com/ufz/ogs-data
shallow = true
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although this PR is already merged: I understand the rationale behind setting shallow = true, but I assume that this can cause some problems, e.g., if a user just pushed something to a feature branch in ogs/data, then the shallow clone (with depth of one) of the submodule won't fetch the latest master commit, which will lead to nasty error messages at least. Or am I wrong?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess you are right..

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will lead to problems because cmake scripts will fetch the missing data with depth=1.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then I'm fine with it.

@ogsbot
Copy link
Member

ogsbot commented Jun 19, 2020

OpenGeoSys development has been moved to GitLab.

See this pull request on GitLab.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants