Use streaming implementation of thriftrw encoder/decoder

[Shaddoll]

What changed?
Use streaming implementation of thriftrw encoder/decoder

Why?
The streaming implementation has better performance according to thriftrw/thriftrw-go#535

How did you test it?
bench tests & existing tests

Potential risks

Release notes

Documentation Changes

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 75a227dd-c3d5-4b96-a459-02744c1dbdea

• 15 of 15 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
• 85 unchanged lines in 10 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 56.874%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
service/history/queue/timer_queue_processor_base.go	1	79.5%
common/task/fifoTaskScheduler.go	2	84.54%
service/history/execution/mutable_state_builder.go	2	69.66%
service/history/queue/timer_queue_processor.go	2	58.8%
service/history/queue/transfer_queue_processor.go	2	57.24%
common/persistence/nosql/nosqlplugin/cassandra/workflow.go	3	55.49%
service/history/execution/context.go	6	73.96%
service/history/execution/mutable_state_task_refresher.go	7	71.61%
common/persistence/nosql/nosqlplugin/cassandra/workflowUtils.go	21	76.93%
common/persistence/nosql/nosqlplugin/cassandra/workflowParsingUtils.go	39	82.59%

Totals
Change from base Build 296dff3b-ac49-4217-8bf4-0ab25c471884:	0.02%
Covered Lines:	82310
Relevant Lines:	144724

---

💛 - Coveralls

[demirkayaender]

bench tests & existing tests

Do you have some findings with bench tests about its performance?

[mkolodezny]

lgtm

[Shaddoll]

bench tests & existing tests

Do you have some findings with bench tests about its performance?

cpu usage reduced by about 9%