Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to ScalaCheck 1.13.0 #862

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fthomas
Copy link
Member

@fthomas fthomas commented Feb 4, 2016

I haven't tested this locally, so let's see how Cogen affects Cats.

@travisbrown
Copy link
Contributor

I ran into ScalaTest runtime errors when I tried this for circe, so I'd guess we'll need to wait for a new milestone here as well.

@fthomas
Copy link
Member Author

fthomas commented Feb 4, 2016

The CI failed because of errors like this:

[error] /home/travis/build/typelevel/cats/laws/src/main/scala/cats/laws/discipline/AlternativeTests.scala:30:
could not find implicit value for parameter a3: org.scalacheck.Arbitrary[A => B]

@mikejcurry
Copy link
Contributor

This could possibly be related to #856, which added a temporary Int => Boolean arbitrary instance. This should be superfluous with the new scalacheck so can probably be removed.

I can investigate later, but won't be home for a few hours to do so.

@ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

ceedubs commented Feb 4, 2016

See also scalatest/scalatest#837

@fthomas
Copy link
Member Author

fthomas commented Feb 4, 2016

Ok, so updating ScalaCheck is more involved than just updating the version number. Since I currently don't have enough time to work on this, I'll close this PR so that someone else can take over.

@fthomas fthomas closed this Feb 4, 2016
@fthomas fthomas deleted the topic/scalacheck-1.13.0 branch February 4, 2016 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants