Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add law-checking for Either Eq instance #681

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2015

Conversation

ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

@ceedubs ceedubs commented Nov 19, 2015

I think we were trying to do this before, but the approach we were
taking was testing the Order instance instead of the Eq instance.

I think we were trying to do this before, but the approach we were
taking was testing the Order instance instead of the Eq instance.
@non
Copy link
Contributor

non commented Nov 19, 2015

👍

@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 83.08%

Merging #681 into master will increase coverage by +0.14% as of 4408039

@@            master    #681   diff @@
======================================
  Files          162     162       
  Stmts         2217    2217       
  Branches        74      74       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
+ Hit           1839    1842     +3
  Partial          0       0       
+ Missed         378     375     -3

Review entire Coverage Diff as of 4408039

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

👍

adelbertc added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2015
Add law-checking for Either Eq instance
@adelbertc adelbertc merged commit 44f2ce4 into typelevel:master Nov 19, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants