Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comments on NonEmptyReducible not being a typeclass #3562

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2020

Conversation

akopich
Copy link
Contributor

@akopich akopich commented Aug 11, 2020

NonEmptyReducible is not a typeclass and should not be used outside of Cats. Thus, the corresponding comments are added to the NonEmptyReducible along with catsDataInstancesForNonEmptyVector and catsDataInstancesForNonEmptyList implementing it.

`NonEmptyReducible` is not a typeclass and should not be used outside of Cats. Thus, the corresponding comments are added to the `NonEmptyReducible` along with `catsDataInstancesForNonEmptyVector` and `catsDataInstancesForNonEmptyList` implementing it.
@travisbrown
Copy link
Contributor

👍 but I think the "should not be used outside of Cats" might not be a universal opinion.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3562 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3562   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.26%   91.26%           
=======================================
  Files         386      386           
  Lines        8587     8587           
  Branches      235      235           
=======================================
  Hits         7837     7837           
  Misses        750      750           

Copy link
Member

@joroKr21 joroKr21 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@kailuowang kailuowang merged commit 951e1b8 into typelevel:master Aug 11, 2020
@travisbrown travisbrown added this to the 2.2.0-RC3 milestone Aug 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants