Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove sbt-partial-unification #3217

Merged

Conversation

travisbrown
Copy link
Contributor

Seems reasonable to get rid of this plugin dependency now that we can replace it with one line of build config.

kailuowang
kailuowang previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2019
LukaJCB
LukaJCB previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2019
@travisbrown
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh, I didn't run validateBC locally, and need -Ypartial-unification there, too. Fixing now…

@travisbrown travisbrown dismissed stale reviews from LukaJCB and kailuowang via c097be3 December 18, 2019 15:15
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 18, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #3217 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3217   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.05%   93.05%           
=======================================
  Files         376      376           
  Lines        7412     7412           
  Branches      192      192           
=======================================
  Hits         6897     6897           
  Misses        515      515
Flag Coverage Δ
#scala_version_212 93.38% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#scala_version_213 92.82% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cbc50f4...c097be3. Read the comment docs.

@travisbrown
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should go green now.

@travisbrown travisbrown added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Dec 18, 2019
@LukaJCB LukaJCB merged commit 9624f5c into typelevel:master Dec 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants