Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement local for Reader #2917

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2019

Conversation

jooohn
Copy link
Contributor

@jooohn jooohn commented Jun 27, 2019

#2304

Same as this PR #2916, I implemented local for Reader.

@jooohn jooohn force-pushed the feature/local-for-reader branch 2 times, most recently from 953f839 to ee84b77 Compare June 27, 2019 07:23
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 27, 2019

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@207bb0d). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2917   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   94.27%           
=========================================
  Files             ?      364           
  Lines             ?     6953           
  Branches          ?      197           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     6555           
  Misses            ?      398           
  Partials          ?        0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
core/src/main/scala/cats/data/package.scala 100% <100%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 207bb0d...98358ac. Read the comment docs.

@kailuowang kailuowang merged commit 48a16cc into typelevel:master Jun 27, 2019
@kailuowang kailuowang added this to the 2.0.0-RC1 milestone Aug 2, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants