-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added two links to the learner page #1697
Conversation
Already checked with @mpilquist. @BartoszMilewski please feel free to let us know if you have issues with us linking to your online lectures, thanks! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1697 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 93.93% 93.92% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 241 246 +5
Lines 4091 4260 +169
Branches 151 155 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 3843 4001 +158
- Misses 248 259 +11
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
of lectures about basic functional structures. | ||
* [Category Theory for Programmers](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbgaMIhjbmEnaH_LTkxLI7FMa2HsnawM_) | ||
by [Bartosz Milewski](https://github.com/BartoszMilewski) is a wonder | ||
serias of category theory lectures oriented towards programmers. The |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
serias
-> series
by [Michael Pilquist](https://github.com/MPilquist) offers a series | ||
of lectures about basic functional structures. | ||
* [Category Theory for Programmers](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbgaMIhjbmEnaH_LTkxLI7FMa2HsnawM_) | ||
by [Bartosz Milewski](https://github.com/BartoszMilewski) is a wonder |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, 2 kind of nitpicky questions/comments.
What exactly do you mean by "wonder series"? Did you mean "wonderful series"? If so, "wonderful" is probably fine, but it might be better to use a more objective description.
I'm a bit hesitant to say "should be easy for non-Haskell programmers to follow". Even introductory category theory and haskell can be a big paradigm shift for people, and I don't want to discourage people or have them feel bad about themselves if they don't easily follow it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Those are really good points. Thanks @ceedubs!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making the changes @kailuowang. This looks great to me.
No description provided.