Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 20, 2022. It is now read-only.

fix unidoc target #469

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2014
Merged

fix unidoc target #469

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2014

Conversation

declerambaul
Copy link

The ./sbt unidoc target is failing with errors like

[error] /Users/fkaelin/workspace/github/summingbird/summingbird-storm/src/main/scala/com/twitter/summingbird/storm/option/SummerOptions.scala:42: OnlineSuccessHandler is already defined as value OnlineSuccessHandler
[error] case class OnlineSuccessHandler(handlerFn: Unit => Unit)

There are duplicate type definitions in the online and storm packages, which compiles fine due to shadowing but the docs don't seem to like that. With this change the unidoc target succeeds (I want/need it as I use Dash for documentation browsing)

Not sure this is the right way to go about it, ./sbt test failed with a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space. There is also duplicate code in

type OnlineSuccessHandler = storm.option.OnlineSuccessHandler
that points to the storm options I am deleting - which makes me wonder why ./sbt compile still succeeds.

@ianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

ianoc commented Mar 5, 2014

Hrm, looks like it must have been a bad merge at some point, there are deprecation pointers in that storm package...

The builder API one is ok, though it should be updated to the new place. We have 2 points of deprecated code that point around the place since these were all moved to online options.

Anyway thanks for the PR

ianoc added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2014
@ianoc ianoc merged commit d7ced40 into develop Mar 5, 2014
@ianoc ianoc deleted the dcl/fix_doc branch March 5, 2014 17:19
snoble pushed a commit to snoble/summingbird that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2017
…-upgrade

Upgrade sbt launcher script (sbt-extras)
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants