Skip to content

Add guide for discovering ServiceNow custom tables in Guardrails #331

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Apr 10, 2025
Merged

Add guide for discovering ServiceNow custom tables in Guardrails #331

merged 9 commits into from
Apr 10, 2025

Conversation

sdsubhajitdas
Copy link
Contributor

  • Introduced a new guide detailing the process of discovering and managing records from custom ServiceNow tables.
  • Updated the ServiceNow to Guardrails sync guide with additional filtering options for synced records.

@sdsubhajitdas
Add documentation for discovering ServiceNow custom tables in Guardrails
456d8d8 
- Introduced a new guide detailing the process of discovering and managing records from custom ServiceNow tables.
- Updated the ServiceNow to Guardrails sync guide with additional filtering options for synced records.
@sdsubhajitdas sdsubhajitdas requested a review from Copilot April 9, 2025 08:49
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

Copilot
Copilot AI reviewed Apr 9, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

docs/guides/servicenow/servicenow-to-guardrails-sync/index.md:56

  • Consider providing a brief explanation or example for the placeholder '{ServiceNow Table}' to improve clarity for users who need to replace it with an actual table name.
- `ServiceNow > {ServiceNow Table} > CMDB > Query`

@rajlearner17
Copy link
Contributor

@sdsubhajitdas can you see co-pilot suggestion and provide an example?

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@rajlearner17
Copy link
Contributor

@sdsubhajitdas Made updates have a look and discuss to close this.

@sdsubhajitdas sdsubhajitdas self-assigned this Apr 10, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@sdsubhajitdas
Enhance documentation for ServiceNow custom tables discovery
4fb99cb 
- Improved clarity and formatting in the guide for discovering records from ServiceNow custom tables.
- Added details on optional policies for fine-grained control over record imports.
- Updated troubleshooting section for better readability and organization.
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Preview Available 🚀

Commit Author: bob-bot
Commit Message: draft of lw8 guardrails account permission post

Preview Link: turbot-com-git-docs-guardrailsadd-servicenow-lw8-09ec83-turbot.vercel.app

@rajlearner17 rajlearner17 changed the title Add documentation for discovering ServiceNow custom tables in Guardrails Add guide for discovering ServiceNow custom tables in Guardrails Apr 10, 2025
@rajlearner17 rajlearner17 merged commit 293b656 into main Apr 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@rajlearner17 rajlearner17 deleted the add-servicenow-lw8-documentation branch April 10, 2025 16:39
rajlearner17 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
@sdsubhajitdas @rajlearner17
Add guide for discovering ServiceNow custom tables in Guardrails (#331)
c37eacf 
Co-authored-by: raj <raj@turbot.com>
rajlearner17 added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
@sdsubhajitdas @rajlearner17
Add guide for discovering ServiceNow custom tables in Guardrails (#331)
e4f9763 
Co-authored-by: raj <raj@turbot.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot Copilot left review comments

@SumitPopat SumitPopat Awaiting requested review from SumitPopat

@rajlearner17 rajlearner17 Awaiting requested review from rajlearner17

Assignees

@sdsubhajitdas sdsubhajitdas

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@sdsubhajitdas @rajlearner17