-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FeatureEnvy and small methods #1535
Labels
Comments
I would be perfectly fine with making it less strict. Maybe everything less than 3 statements is fine? |
I just came here to suggest giving a tolerance option—e.g. tolerance of |
JuanVqz
added a commit
to JuanVqz/reek
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2023
This is adding a configuration `max_calls` key for the FeatureEnvy smell detector Fixes troessner#1535
JuanVqz
added a commit
to JuanVqz/reek
that referenced
this issue
Oct 16, 2023
This is adding a configuration `max_calls` key for the FeatureEnvy smell detector Fixes troessner#1535
JuanVqz
added a commit
to JuanVqz/reek
that referenced
this issue
Oct 19, 2023
This is adding a configuration `max_calls` key for the FeatureEnvy smell detector Fixes troessner#1535
JuanVqz
added a commit
to JuanVqz/reek
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2023
This is adding a configuration `max_calls` key for the FeatureEnvy smell detector Fixes troessner#1535
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm really beginning to dislike the FeatureEnvy detector for small methods:
Should we make this less strict? Require a larger difference? More statements? WDYT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: