Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Response Cache v1 #3209

Merged
merged 51 commits into from
Sep 14, 2021
Merged

Response Cache v1 #3209

merged 51 commits into from
Sep 14, 2021

Conversation

rmccorm4
Copy link
Collaborator

@rmccorm4 rmccorm4 commented Aug 6, 2021

Threading

  • single-threaded implementation
  • thread-safe implementation

Unit Tests

  • simple unit tests
  • multi-threaded unit tests
  • test LRU ordering

Memory

  • CPU memory only

Clean Up

  • Triton logging instead of custom macro
  • More fine-grained locking?

src/core/response_cache.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/response_cache.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/response_cache.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/response_cache.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/response_cache.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/response_cache.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/response_cache.h Show resolved Hide resolved
src/core/response_cache.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@GuanLuo GuanLuo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just have some minor comments

src/core/response_cache.cc Show resolved Hide resolved
src/test/response_cache_test.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rmccorm4 rmccorm4 marked this pull request as ready for review September 13, 2021 17:34
@rmccorm4 rmccorm4 merged commit aa05498 into main Sep 14, 2021
@deadeyegoodwin deadeyegoodwin deleted the rmccormick-response-cache-v1 branch September 14, 2021 19:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants