Skip to content

v4: metadata collapsing now preserves operation order for correctness #2115

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 28, 2025

Conversation

ericallam
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 28, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: d654e74

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 28, 2025

Walkthrough

This change refactors the logic for collapsing metadata operations within the system. The core function responsible for collapsing operations now processes the operations array sequentially, collapsing only consecutive operations of the same type and key, rather than aggregating all operations by key regardless of their order. Test cases were updated to reflect this new order-preserving collapse behavior, expecting more granular, ordered operation sequences instead of fully merged operations. Additionally, a changeset entry documents this patch, indicating a fix to the correctness of metadata collapsing. No exported or public interfaces were altered.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@matt-aitken matt-aitken merged commit 0f66023 into main May 28, 2025
32 of 33 checks passed
@matt-aitken matt-aitken deleted the ea-branch-73 branch May 28, 2025 13:52
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/core/src/v3/runMetadata/operations.ts (1)

189-196: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication and improve type safety.

The pattern for checking consecutive operations is repeated three times with similar structure. Additionally, the type assertions could be cleaner.

Consider extracting a helper function to check consecutive operations:

+function isConsecutiveSameOperation<T extends RunMetadataChangeOperation>(
+  operations: RunMetadataChangeOperation[],
+  index: number,
+  type: T['type'],
+  key: string
+): operations is T[] {
+  const op = operations[index];
+  return op?.type === type && (op as T).key === key;
+}

Then simplify the conditions:

-      while (
-        j < operations.length &&
-        operations[j]?.type === "increment" &&
-        (operations[j] as typeof op)?.key === op.key
-      ) {
-        sum += (operations[j] as typeof op).value;
+      while (
+        j < operations.length &&
+        isConsecutiveSameOperation<typeof op>(operations, j, "increment", op.key)
+      ) {
+        sum += operations[j].value;

This would improve type safety and reduce repetition across all three collapsible operation types.

Also applies to: 206-213, 222-228

.changeset/nasty-cobras-wonder.md (1)

5-5: Consider expanding the changeset description for better clarity.

The current description is too brief. Users would benefit from understanding what changed and why it matters.

Consider a more descriptive changeset:

-Fix metadata collapsing correctness
+Fix metadata collapsing to preserve operation order for correctness
+
+Previously, metadata operations were collapsed globally by key, which could produce incorrect results when operations depended on order. Now, only consecutive operations of the same type and key are collapsed, preserving the execution order and ensuring correct final metadata state.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 021d6d8 and d654e74.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .changeset/nasty-cobras-wonder.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/v3/runMetadata/operations.ts (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/test/standardMetadataManager.test.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
packages/core/src/v3/runMetadata/operations.ts (1)
packages/core/src/v3/schemas/common.ts (2)
  • RunMetadataChangeOperation (53-60)
  • RunMetadataChangeOperation (62-62)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: units / webapp / 📊 Merge Reports
  • GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/core/src/v3/runMetadata/operations.ts (1)

176-240: Well-implemented order-preserving collapse logic!

The sequential scan approach correctly preserves operation order while collapsing only consecutive operations of the same type and key. This ensures correctness by maintaining the relative order of operations that affect the final metadata state.

packages/core/test/standardMetadataManager.test.ts (1)

398-540: Excellent test coverage for the order-preserving collapse behavior!

The updated test expectations correctly reflect the new behavior where operations are only collapsed when consecutive. The comprehensive test suite includes:

  • Validation that non-consecutive operations are preserved
  • Sanity checks ensuring collapsed operations produce identical results
  • Edge cases covering various data types and scenarios

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants