Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 2: Workflow does not contain permissions #2078
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
WalkthroughThe workflow configuration file for publishing the web app was updated to include an explicit permissions block. This block grants the workflow read access to repository contents and write access to packages, refining the security context for workflow execution. No other changes or functional modifications were introduced. Changes
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish-webapp.yml (1)
3-6: Consider future tightening or scoped overrides
Althoughpackages: writeis required to push to GHCR, you could override or narrow permissions per-job if this workflow grows additional jobs that don’t need package write access. Also, if you adopt GitHub’s OIDC for external registry auth later, addingid-token: writemight be necessary.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/publish-webapp.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/publish-webapp.yml (1)
3-6: Explicit least‐privilege permissions block added
Adding a top-levelpermissionsblock with onlycontents: readandpackages: writeaddresses the code-scanning alert and ensures the workflow token cannot perform unintended actions. Placement at the root level means all jobs inherit these minimal scopes.
Potential fix for https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/security/code-scanning/2
To fix the issue, we will add a
permissionsblock at the root of the workflow file. This block will specify the minimal permissions required for the workflow to function correctly. Based on the workflow's steps, the following permissions are needed:contents: readfor checking out the repository.packages: writefor logging into the GitHub Container Registry and pushing Docker images.The
permissionsblock will be added at the top level of the workflow, ensuring that all jobs inherit these permissions unless overridden.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Summary by CodeRabbit