Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 3: Workflow does not contain permissions

[D-K-P]

Potential fix for https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/security/code-scanning/3

To fix the issue, we will add a permissions block to the workflow. This block will explicitly define the minimum permissions required for the workflow to function correctly. Based on the workflow's steps:

• The contents: read permission is required for actions like checking out the repository.
• The contents: write permission is needed for creating GitHub releases in the changesets/action@v1 step.
• Additional permissions like packages: write might be required for publishing to npm, but this is handled via the NPM_TOKEN secret, so it does not require explicit permissions.

The permissions block will be added at the workflow level to apply to all jobs, ensuring consistency and simplicity.

---

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions release workflow configuration to set explicit permissions.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 417233c

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow for releases was updated to explicitly include a top-level permissions section, granting write access to repository contents. No other modifications to workflow logic, steps, or public interfaces were made.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/workflows/release.yml	Added a top-level permissions section with contents: write. No other changes made.

Poem

🐇
A tweak to the workflow, so neat and slight,
Permissions set for contents: write.
No steps were changed, no logic bent—
Just making clear what access is meant.
With YAML in paw, I hop with glee,
For clarity brings tranquility!

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.

---

Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f0809e6 and 417233c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: units / 🧪 Unit Tests

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

3-5: Inconsistency in permissions documentation vs. implementation
The AI-generated summary mentions adding both contents: read and contents: write, but the workflow only declares:

permissions:
  contents: write

According to GitHub’s docs, setting write may implicitly include read, but it’s worth confirming. If write does not grant read access, you should explicitly add:

permissions:
  contents: read
  contents: write

to ensure actions/checkout still works.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.