-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 725
V4 dequeue test fixes #1991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V4 dequeue test fixes #1991
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThis update modifies several test files to change how messages or runs are dequeued from queues. Instead of dequeuing multiple items in a single call, the tests now perform multiple sequential dequeue operations, each retrieving a single item. In some cases, the tests are marked as expected to fail due to current system limitations. The changes also include updates to type annotations and the explicit use of queue names. No changes were made to exported or public entities. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)internal-packages/run-engine/src/run-queue/index.test.ts (1)
internal-packages/run-engine/src/engine/tests/pendingVersion.test.ts (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
When dequeuing in v4 now, we only return a max of 1 run per environment. The tests didn't assume this so some were failing
Summary by CodeRabbit