Skip to content

Conversation

@folkertdev
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@folkertdev folkertdev force-pushed the codecov-nextest branch 7 times, most recently from bcc8d9c to d0e6bf0 Compare April 10, 2025 11:06
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Flag Coverage Δ
test-aarch64-apple-darwin 90.44% <ø> (?)
test-x86_64-apple-darwin 89.25% <ø> (?)
test-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu 90.20% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment on lines 97 to 99
files: lcov.info
files: ./lcov.info
fail_ci_if_error: false
flags: test-${{matrix.target}}
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
slug: codecov/codecov-demo
name: test-${{matrix.target}}
verbose: true
Copy link
Member Author

@folkertdev folkertdev Apr 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • the slug is not needed for us (and I believe it caused issues)
  • the flags allow us to see coverage per-target
  • may as well make this verbose, easier to troubleshoot future issues

@folkertdev folkertdev merged commit 804742d into main Apr 14, 2025
22 checks passed
@folkertdev folkertdev deleted the codecov-nextest branch April 14, 2025 09:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants