Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate TLint into CI #76

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2022
Merged

Integrate TLint into CI #76

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2022

Conversation

dottorblaster
Copy link
Contributor

@dottorblaster dottorblaster commented Nov 14, 2022

Integrating TLint into the CI so no new checks hit main if not compliant

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Nov 16, 2022

Coverage Status

coverage: 94.737%. remained the same
when pulling 65c9b9a on tlint
into f825f67 on main.

@dottorblaster dottorblaster marked this pull request as ready for review November 17, 2022 16:59
Copy link
Member

@fabriziosestito fabriziosestito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mega LGTM in general, maybe a dependency too much in the CI step.

.github/workflows/ci.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@fabriziosestito fabriziosestito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

green from my side

Copy link
Contributor

@arbulu89 arbulu89 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!
Could we use external schemas to do the checking/
Wanda already has its own schema in the guides folder.
This way, we don't depend on updating the linter project if we change the checks structure and the schema.

We could add an optional flag for that, and provider the file.
What do you think?

.github/workflows/ci.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
fetch-depth: 0

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove newline here to be consistent with the rest of the file

@dottorblaster
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arbulu89 you are actually right, we have to do that using a build script, I tracked that as a ticket this morning 😄

@dottorblaster dottorblaster merged commit 1e16c8c into main Nov 18, 2022
@dottorblaster dottorblaster deleted the tlint branch November 18, 2022 14:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants