Skip to content

Conversation

Crozzers
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes #646.

Due to recent changes to the strong/em regex, the match may include additional characters that aren't strictly part of the match. This was messing up the substitution in the code friendly extra.

I've fixed this by accounting for those potential extra chars in the extra

@Crozzers Crozzers changed the title Fix #646 Fix code friendly extra incorrectly converting consecutive em/strongs (#646) Oct 11, 2025
@nicholasserra
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM Thanks!

@nicholasserra nicholasserra merged commit 8c74601 into trentm:master Oct 13, 2025
15 checks passed
@justanotheranonymoususer

Thanks for the fix. This caused a regression: #652.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unexpected * in A_**B** with code-friendly

3 participants