Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Present technical conclusions from failed OC project #4815

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

arielshaqed
Copy link
Contributor

Please add more in review!

Closes #4810.

@arielshaqed arielshaqed requested a review from a team December 14, 2022 13:43
@arielshaqed arielshaqed added docs Improvements or additions to documentation performance exclude-changelog PR description should not be included in next release changelog area/client/hadoopfs labels Dec 14, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@lynnro314 lynnro314 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor

@talSofer talSofer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @arielshaqed for this writeup, it is very helpful!

We assumed multiple non-functional and one functional requirements that did
not actually exist. We should have specified these requirements as part of
the design and communicated them with VE team.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would add here -
The execution plan didn't precede experiments that could have helped us test our main premise quickly. If the main premise is - lakeFS OC is improving Spark write performance to lakeFS, we should start with experiments to test the assumption that we can achieve this main goal. Also, the goals should include concrete performance targets at the first place.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Added...

Copy link
Contributor Author

@arielshaqed arielshaqed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Pulling...

@arielshaqed
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pulling by force: this is a docs PR and functional tests are not blockers to pulling it.

@arielshaqed arielshaqed merged commit 779dfd2 into master Dec 19, 2022
@arielshaqed arielshaqed deleted the docs/4810-summarize-lakefs-oc-conclusions branch December 19, 2022 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/client/hadoopfs docs Improvements or additions to documentation exclude-changelog PR description should not be included in next release changelog performance
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Summarize conclusions from LakeFSOutputCommitter
3 participants