Use match? instead of lua-match? for queries

[natsukagami]

Improves compatibility with non-nvim tree-sitter implementations.
Since we only have very simple patterns, just switching to match should be fine.

[susliko]

Hi!
This looks relatable to the discussion in
#286

[natsukagami]

Thanks for pointing me there. I think for these queries they don't really need to be lua-match, and using match allows both the WAsm and Rust implementations to handle the predicates.
I'm using kakoune myself, with https://github.com/phaazon/kak-tree-sitter as the tree-sitter integration.

[natsukagami]

Failing test doesn't seem right:

 class C:
 // ^keyword
   fooooo.map: x =>
   // ^type
   //     ^method.call
     x + 1

This used to pass due to lua-match predicate not being run with tree-sitter command.

I changed the test to

 class C:
 // ^keyword
 //    ^type
   fooooo.map: x =>
   //     ^method.call
     x + 1

[susliko]

Looks good to me. Thanks!