Skip to content

Conversation

@ghostbuster91
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ckipp01
Copy link
Collaborator

ckipp01 commented May 18, 2023

I'd have to play around with it, but I think we need support for top level expressions before we do this no? #198

@eed3si9n eed3si9n mentioned this pull request May 18, 2023
@ghostbuster91
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd have to play around with it, but I think we need support for top level expressions before we do this no? #198

Ah, right. My sbt file that I was playing around got luckily parsed without almost any errors, though that was just a coincidence.

@ckipp01 ckipp01 marked this pull request as draft May 22, 2023 06:53
@eed3si9n
Copy link
Collaborator

Now that @susliko contributed #271, we might be good to go on this one as well.

@eed3si9n eed3si9n marked this pull request as ready for review May 31, 2023 17:18
@eed3si9n eed3si9n merged commit 2a837f8 into tree-sitter:master May 31, 2023
@ghostbuster91 ghostbuster91 deleted the patch-1 branch May 31, 2023 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants