APT whitelist request for clang-4.0

[peternewman]

No description provided.

[travisbot]

_This is an automated comment._

Ran tests and found setuid bits by purely textual search. Further analysis is required.

If these are found to be benign, examine http://github.com/travis-ci/apt-package-whitelist/compare/test-apt-package-whitelist-3296 and its PR.

Packages found: clang-4.0 clang-format-4.0 clang-tidy-4.0 clang-include-fixer-4.0 clang-4.0-doc libclang1-4.0 libclang1-4.0-dbg libclang-4.0-dev libclang-common-4.0-dev libfuzzer-4.0-dev python-clang-4.0 clang-4.0-examples libllvm4.0 libllvm4.0-dbg llvm-4.0 llvm-4.0-runtime llvm-4.0-dev llvm-4.0-tools libllvm-4.0-ocaml-dev llvm-4.0-doc llvm-4.0-examples lldb-4.0 liblldb-4.0 liblldb-4.0-dbg python-lldb-4.0 liblldb-4.0-dev

See https://travis-ci.org/travis-ci/apt-whitelist-checker/builds/153697151 for details.

[peternewman]

Hi @BanzaiMan is there any update on this or the associated PR #3297 ?

[rianquinn]

Any progress with this?

[peternewman]

@rianquinn you might be more interested in #4033 although it's not got any further.

[peternewman]

clang-5.0 is now in via #4033, so if I were you I'd use that unless you explicitly need clang-4.0

[rianquinn]

@peternewman We do need clang-4.0 specifically. It appears that the packages are added to the whitelist, but the source whitelist is missing the llvm-toolchain-precise-4.0. There is a llvm-toolchain-trusty-4.0.

Looking at LLVM's site, the repo does exist, so someone just as to add it to the source whitelist.
http://apt.llvm.org/

[peternewman]

I think you want this one then @rianquinn travis-ci/apt-source-safelist#360 .

I'd suggest liking it or bumping to try and get some action.