Skip to content

@uppy: upgrade biome and more improvements#6244

Open
qxprakash wants to merge 2 commits intotransloadit:mainfrom
qxprakash:upgrade_biome
Open

@uppy: upgrade biome and more improvements#6244
qxprakash wants to merge 2 commits intotransloadit:mainfrom
qxprakash:upgrade_biome

Conversation

@qxprakash
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@qxprakash qxprakash commented Mar 26, 2026

  • This PR upgrades biome from 2.0.5 -> 2.1.2 and adds two new rules
  • remove stale suppressions.
  • remove stale code.

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 26, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6bc038a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@socket-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

socket-security bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updated@​biomejs/​biome@​2.0.5 ⏵ 2.1.2100 +110010099100

View full report

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dde27afd84

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@qxprakash qxprakash requested a review from mifi March 26, 2026 12:27
@mifi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mifi commented Mar 26, 2026

looks good but I think we should wait until typescript pr #6179 is merged

@qxprakash qxprakash requested a review from Murderlon March 26, 2026 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants