Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve Sidekiq background job stability #292

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2016
Merged

improve Sidekiq background job stability #292

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2016

Conversation

drewda
Copy link
Member

@drewda drewda commented Jan 6, 2016

closes #291

If job receives a huge number of stop IDs, it will load them into memory in batches, rather than all at once. In theory, the garbage collector will clear out each batch when it's no longer relevant.

see also: https://github.com/mperham/sidekiq/wiki/Problems-and-Troubleshooting#memory-bloat

another partial solution to #291
@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@ class ConflateStopsWithOsmWorker
include Sidekiq::Worker

def perform(stop_ids = [])
stops = Stop.where(id: stop_ids)
Stop.conflate_with_osm(stops)
stops = Stop.where(id: stop_ids).find_in_batches(batch_size: 1000) do |batch_of_stops|

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Useless assignment to variable - stops. Did you mean stop_ids?
Line is too long. [90/80]

CHANGE_PAYLOAD_MAX_ENTITIES = 1_000
STOP_TIMES_MAX_LOAD = 100_000
CHANGE_PAYLOAD_MAX_ENTITIES = Figaro.env.feed_eater_change_payload_max_entities.try(:to_i) || 1_000
STOP_TIMES_MAX_LOAD = Figaro.env.feed_eater_stop_times_max_load.try(:to_i) || 100_000

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line is too long. [87/80]

drewda added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2016
improve Sidekiq background job stability
@drewda drewda merged commit 79648f1 into master Jan 6, 2016
@drewda drewda deleted the fesw-tuning branch January 6, 2016 20:07
@drewda drewda removed the in progress label Jan 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sidekiq process failing when some FeedEaterScheduleWorker jobs consume too much memory
3 participants