Skip to content

Conversation

@scottyhagan
Copy link

Why?

There are several extra endpoints needed to support Idaptive as an idp. They require four extra endpoints. One for service providers configs, two for resource types and one for schemas. All are listed as part of the SCIM spec (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7644)

What?

Add the four required endpoints to support Idaptive as an idp.

@scottyhagan scottyhagan changed the title Feature/idaptive integration Idaptive integration Dec 10, 2020
Copy link

@stevenallen05 stevenallen05 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to the test metrics, there's a lot of code branches that aren't tested. The lines are hit, but due to them being single-line conditionals, there's a lot of code branches that are never tested:

image

@myang0 myang0 merged commit a51b496 into master Dec 17, 2020
ErebusBat pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2021
…2.4.2

Bump actionview from 5.2.4.1 to 5.2.4.2
@amaury-sie amaury-sie deleted the feature/idaptive-integration branch June 14, 2023 22:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants