Use ftdetect mechanism with setf html
#46
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In commit 12e3799 an aggressive method of detecting "html" filetypes was added. But it is too aggressive, and causes problems with (re)loading a file like the following, which got detected as "htmldjango" by Vim's `filetype.vim` process initially: {% load staticfiles %} <!DOCTYPE html> <html …> While `BufRead,BufNewFile` is used typically, this patch keeps using `BufReadPost`, which appears to be used to target netrw explicitly?!
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In commit 12e3799 an aggressive method of detecting "html" filetypes was
added.
But it is too aggressive, and causes problems with (re)loading a file like
the following, which got detected as "htmldjango" by Vim's
filetype.vimprocess initially:While
BufRead,BufNewFileis used typically, this patch keeps usingBufReadPost, which appears to be used to target netrw explicitly?!