Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update addrlabel.c #473

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update addrlabel.c #473

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

SoundButton
Copy link

@SoundButton SoundButton commented Sep 29, 2017

Why the logical &&?
Would like to add this will lead to problems when p->ifindex = 0.

Why the logical &&?
@KernelPRBot
Copy link

Hi @Optimizingroman!

Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel!

Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch.

Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process.

Here's what to do:

  • Format your contribution according to kernel requirements
  • Decide who to send your contribution to
  • Set up your system to send your contribution as an email
  • Send your contribution and wait for feedback

How do I format my contribution?

The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations.

Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea.

You can create patches with git format-patch.

Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary.

Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with.

Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel.

Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this.

Who do I send my contribution to?

The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes.

If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the get_maintainer.pl script in the kernel source can help you.

get_maintainer.pl will take the patch or patches you created in the previous step, and tell you who is responsible for them, and what mailing lists are used. You can also take a look at the MAINTAINERS file by hand.

Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches.

It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.)

How do I send my contribution?

Use git send-email, which will ensure that your patches are formatted in the standard manner. In order to use git send-email, you'll need to configure git to use your SMTP email server.

For more information about using git send-email, look at the Git documentation or type git help send-email. There are a number of useful guides and tutorials about git send-email that can be found on the internet.

How do I get help if I'm stuck?

Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed.

Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine.

If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:

  • Kernel Newbies - this website contains a lot of useful resources for new kernel developers.
  • If you'd like a step-by-step, challenge-based introduction to kernel development, the Eudyptula Challenge would be an excellent start.
  • The kernel documentation - see also the Documentation directory in the kernel tree.

If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers!

I sent my patch - now what?

You wait.

You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at.

Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:

  • You might get a response to your email. Often these will be comments, which may require you to make changes to your patch, or explain why your way is the best way. You should respond to these comments, and you may need to submit another revision of your patch to address the issues raised.
  • Your patch might be merged into the subsystem tree. Code that becomes part of Linux isn't merged into the main repository straight away - it first goes into the subsystem tree, which is managed by the subsystem maintainer. It is then batched up with a number of other changes sent to Linus for inclusion. (This process is described in some detail in the kernel development process guide).
  • Your patch might be ignored completely. This happens sometimes - don't take it personally. Here's what to do:
    • Wait a bit more - patches often take several weeks to get a response; more if they were sent at a busy time.
    • Kernel developers often silently ignore patches that break the rules. Check for obvious violations of the the Submitting Patches guidelines, the style guidelines, and any other documentation you can find about your subsystem. Check that you're sending your patch to the right place.
    • Try again later. When you resend it, don't add angry commentary, as that will get your patch ignored. It might also get you silently blacklisted.

Further information

Happy hacking!

This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot.

@SoundButton SoundButton reopened this Sep 29, 2017
apxii pushed a commit to apxii/linux that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2017
commit 24d5373 upstream.

The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment
which are not power of two.

However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power
of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case.

Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two"
introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next
on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present.

This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with
alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two.

[1]

[    0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation
[    0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.024584] Modules linked in:
[    0.024708]
[    0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473
[    0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[    0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000
[    0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>]
pstate: 60000045
[    0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0
[    0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000
[    0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[    0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[    0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0
[    0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000
[    0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010
[    0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef
[    0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f
[    0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041
[    0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042
[    0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c
[    0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84
[    0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f
[    0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035
[    0.029056]
[    0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    0.029297] Call trace:
[    0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to
                               0xffff80003d847c30)
[    0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000
ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678
[    0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004
ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035
[    0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88
ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778
[    0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000
ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0
[    0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[    0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000
000000000000017f 0000000000000000
[    0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005
ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570
[    0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40
0000000000000042 0000000000000006
[    0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d
ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006
[    0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f
[    0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20
[    0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4
[    0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130
[    0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248
[    0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100
[    0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50

Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
regit pushed a commit to regit/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2018
Commit 111e6b4 ("selftests/bpf: make test_verifier run most programs")
enables tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier unit cases to run
via bpf_prog_test_run command. With the latest code base,
test_verifier had one test case failure:

  ...
  torvalds#473/p check deducing bounds from const, 2 FAIL retval 1 != 0
  0: (b7) r0 = 1
  1: (75) if r0 s>= 0x1 goto pc+1
   R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
  2: (95) exit

  from 1 to 3: R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
  3: (d5) if r0 s<= 0x1 goto pc+1
   R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
  4: (95) exit

  from 3 to 5: R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
  5: (1f) r1 -= r0
  6: (95) exit
  processed 7 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 0
  ...

The test case does not set return value in the test
structure and hence the return value from the prog run
is assumed to be 0. However, the actual return value is 1.
As a result, the test failed. The fix is to correctly set
the return value in the test structure.

Fixes: 111e6b4 ("selftests/bpf: make test_verifier run most programs")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
iaguis pushed a commit to kinvolk/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2018
commit 24d5373 upstream.

The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment
which are not power of two.

However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power
of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case.

Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two"
introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next
on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present.

This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with
alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two.

[1]

[    0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation
[    0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.024584] Modules linked in:
[    0.024708]
[    0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473
[    0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[    0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000
[    0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>]
pstate: 60000045
[    0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0
[    0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000
[    0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[    0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[    0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0
[    0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000
[    0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010
[    0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef
[    0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f
[    0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041
[    0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042
[    0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c
[    0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84
[    0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f
[    0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035
[    0.029056]
[    0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    0.029297] Call trace:
[    0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to
                               0xffff80003d847c30)
[    0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000
ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678
[    0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004
ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035
[    0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88
ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778
[    0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000
ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0
[    0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[    0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000
000000000000017f 0000000000000000
[    0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005
ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570
[    0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40
0000000000000042 0000000000000006
[    0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d
ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006
[    0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f
[    0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20
[    0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4
[    0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130
[    0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248
[    0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100
[    0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50

Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
c4goldsw pushed a commit to c4goldsw/linux that referenced this pull request May 29, 2019
commit 24d5373 upstream.

The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment
which are not power of two.

However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power
of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case.

Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two"
introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next
on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present.

This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with
alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two.

[1]

[    0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation
[    0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.024584] Modules linked in:
[    0.024708]
[    0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473
[    0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[    0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000
[    0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>]
pstate: 60000045
[    0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0
[    0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000
[    0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[    0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[    0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0
[    0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000
[    0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010
[    0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef
[    0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f
[    0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041
[    0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042
[    0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c
[    0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84
[    0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f
[    0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035
[    0.029056]
[    0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    0.029297] Call trace:
[    0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to
                               0xffff80003d847c30)
[    0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000
ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678
[    0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004
ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035
[    0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88
ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778
[    0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000
ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0
[    0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[    0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000
000000000000017f 0000000000000000
[    0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005
ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570
[    0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40
0000000000000042 0000000000000006
[    0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d
ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006
[    0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f
[    0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20
[    0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4
[    0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130
[    0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248
[    0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100
[    0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50

Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
mrchapp pushed a commit to mrchapp/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2019
We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
heftig pushed a commit to zen-kernel/zen-kernel that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
chewitt pushed a commit to chewitt/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2019
commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jackpot51 pushed a commit to pop-os/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2019
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850456

commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
Noltari pushed a commit to Noltari/linux that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2019
commit 77c3012 upstream.

We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi
device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by
sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module.

And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following:

[   34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8
[   34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[   34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G        W         5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473
[   34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0
[   34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   34.644545] Call Trace:
[   34.644907]  scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0
[   34.645511]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.646046]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.646559]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.647041]  scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40
[   34.647652]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.648186]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.648691]  put_device+0x17/0x30
[   34.649157]  scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360
[   34.649953]  execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80
[   34.650603]  scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30
[   34.651221]  device_release+0x74/0x110
[   34.651732]  kobject_put+0x116/0x390
[   34.652230]  sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50
[   34.652935]  sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f
[   34.653579]  dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40
[   34.654103]  sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60
[   34.654603]  kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250
[   34.655165]  __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60
[   34.655639]  vfs_write+0xc7/0x280
[   34.656117]  ksys_write+0x6d/0x140
[   34.656591]  __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30
[   34.657114]  do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400
[   34.657627]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[   34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130

During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then,
sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting
in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON.

To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to
increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
upa pushed a commit to upa/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2020
samueldr pushed a commit to samueldr/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2020
[ Upstream commit 24d5373 ]

The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment
which are not power of two.

However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power
of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case.

Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two"
introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next
on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present.

This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with
alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two.

[1]

[    0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation
[    0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.024584] Modules linked in:
[    0.024708]
[    0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473
[    0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[    0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000
[    0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>]
pstate: 60000045
[    0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0
[    0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000
[    0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[    0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[    0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0
[    0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000
[    0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010
[    0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef
[    0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f
[    0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041
[    0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042
[    0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c
[    0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84
[    0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f
[    0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035
[    0.029056]
[    0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    0.029297] Call trace:
[    0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to
                               0xffff80003d847c30)
[    0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000
ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678
[    0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004
ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035
[    0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88
ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778
[    0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000
ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0
[    0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[    0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000
000000000000017f 0000000000000000
[    0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005
ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570
[    0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40
0000000000000042 0000000000000006
[    0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d
ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006
[    0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f
[    0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20
[    0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4
[    0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130
[    0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248
[    0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100
[    0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50

Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
samueldr pushed a commit to mobile-nixos/linux that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2020
[ Upstream commit 24d5373 ]

The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment
which are not power of two.

However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power
of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case.

Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two"
introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next
on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present.

This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with
alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two.

[1]

[    0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation
[    0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.024584] Modules linked in:
[    0.024708]
[    0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473
[    0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[    0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000
[    0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>]
pstate: 60000045
[    0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0
[    0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000
[    0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[    0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[    0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0
[    0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000
[    0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010
[    0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef
[    0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f
[    0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041
[    0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042
[    0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c
[    0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84
[    0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f
[    0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035
[    0.029056]
[    0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    0.029297] Call trace:
[    0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to
                               0xffff80003d847c30)
[    0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000
ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678
[    0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004
ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035
[    0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88
ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778
[    0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000
ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0
[    0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[    0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000
000000000000017f 0000000000000000
[    0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005
ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570
[    0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40
0000000000000042 0000000000000006
[    0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d
ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006
[    0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f
[    0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20
[    0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4
[    0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130
[    0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248
[    0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100
[    0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50

Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
fengguang pushed a commit to 0day-ci/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2021
My machine Oopsed while testing SCD30 sensor in interrupt driven mode:

 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000188
 pgd = (ptrval)
 [00000188] *pgd=00000000
 Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
 Modules linked in:
 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.96+ torvalds#473
 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
 PC is at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x4c
 LR is at devres_add+0x18/0x38
 ...
 [<8070ecac>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<804916a8>] (devres_add+0x18/0x38)
 [<804916a8>] (devres_add) from [<805ef708>] (devm_iio_trigger_alloc+0x5c/0x7c)
 [<805ef708>] (devm_iio_trigger_alloc) from [<805f0a90>] (scd30_probe+0x1d4/0x3f0)
 [<805f0a90>] (scd30_probe) from [<805f10fc>] (scd30_i2c_probe+0x54/0x64)
 [<805f10fc>] (scd30_i2c_probe) from [<80583390>] (i2c_device_probe+0x150/0x278)
 [<80583390>] (i2c_device_probe) from [<8048e6c0>] (really_probe+0x1f8/0x360)

I've found out, that it's due to missing parent/owner device in iio_dev struct
which then leads to NULL pointer dereference during spinlock while registering
the device resource via devres_add().

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.9+
Fixes: 64b3d8b ("iio: chemical: scd30: add core driver")
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
nbdd0121 pushed a commit to nbdd0121/linux that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2021
…iner-of

Don't hide unsafety in `$ptr` argument of `container_of!`
ammarfaizi2 pushed a commit to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2021
commit 24d5373 upstream.

The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment
which are not power of two.

However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power
of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case.

Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two"
introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next
on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present.

This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with
alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two.

[1]

[    0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation
[    0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.024584] Modules linked in:
[    0.024708]
[    0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473
[    0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[    0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000
[    0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>]
pstate: 60000045
[    0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0
[    0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000
[    0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[    0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
[    0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0
[    0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000
[    0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010
[    0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef
[    0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f
[    0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041
[    0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042
[    0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c
[    0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84
[    0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000
[    0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f
[    0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035
[    0.029056]
[    0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    0.029297] Call trace:
[    0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to
                               0xffff80003d847c30)
[    0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000
ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678
[    0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004
ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035
[    0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88
ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778
[    0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000
ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0
[    0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
0000000000000000 0000000000000000
[    0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000
000000000000017f 0000000000000000
[    0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005
ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570
[    0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40
0000000000000042 0000000000000006
[    0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d
ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006
[    0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f
[    0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[    0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20
[    0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4
[    0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130
[    0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248
[    0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100
[    0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50

Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
intel-lab-lkp pushed a commit to intel-lab-lkp/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Add a test which attempts to call bpf_check_mtu() and writes the MTU
into .rodata section of the BPF program, and for comparison this adds
test cases also for .bss and .data section again. The bpf_check_mtu()
is a bit more special in that the passed mtu argument is read and
written by the helper (instead of just written to). Assert that writes
into .rodata remain rejected by the verifier.

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t verifier_const
  [    1.657367] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.657773] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  torvalds#473/1   verifier_const/rodata/strtol: write rejected:OK
  torvalds#473/2   verifier_const/bss/strtol: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/3   verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/4   verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:OK
  torvalds#473/5   verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/6   verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473     verifier_const:OK
  [...]
  Summary: 2/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

For comparison, without the MEM_UNINIT on bpf_check_mtu's proto:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const
  [...]
  torvalds#473/3   verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK
  run_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
  run_subtest:FAIL:unexpected_load_success unexpected success: 0
  torvalds#473/4   verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:FAIL
  torvalds#473/5   verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/6   verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473     verifier_const:FAIL
  [...]

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
guidosarducci pushed a commit to guidosarducci/linux that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Add a test which attempts to call bpf_check_mtu() and writes the MTU
into .rodata section of the BPF program, and for comparison this adds
test cases also for .bss and .data section again. The bpf_check_mtu()
is a bit more special in that the passed mtu argument is read and
written by the helper (instead of just written to). Assert that writes
into .rodata remain rejected by the verifier.

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const
  [...]
  ./test_progs -t verifier_const
  [    1.657367] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
  [    1.657773] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
  torvalds#473/1   verifier_const/rodata/strtol: write rejected:OK
  torvalds#473/2   verifier_const/bss/strtol: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/3   verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/4   verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:OK
  torvalds#473/5   verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/6   verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473     verifier_const:OK
  [...]
  Summary: 2/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

For comparison, without the MEM_UNINIT on bpf_check_mtu's proto:

  # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const
  [...]
  torvalds#473/3   verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK
  run_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
  run_subtest:FAIL:unexpected_load_success unexpected success: 0
  torvalds#473/4   verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:FAIL
  torvalds#473/5   verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473/6   verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK
  torvalds#473     verifier_const:FAIL
  [...]

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-9-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants