-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update addrlabel.c #473
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update addrlabel.c #473
Conversation
Why the logical &&?
Hi @Optimizingroman! Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel! Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch. Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process. Here's what to do:
How do I format my contribution?The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations. Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea. You can create patches with Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary. Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with. Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel. Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this. Who do I send my contribution to?The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes. If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the
Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches. It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.) How do I send my contribution?Use For more information about using How do I get help if I'm stuck?Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed. Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine. If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:
If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers! I sent my patch - now what?You wait. You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at. Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:
Further information
Happy hacking! This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot. |
commit 24d5373 upstream. The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment which are not power of two. However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case. Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two" introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present. This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two. [1] [ 0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation [ 0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.024584] Modules linked in: [ 0.024708] [ 0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473 [ 0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) [ 0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000 [ 0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>] pstate: 60000045 [ 0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0 [ 0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0 [ 0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010 [ 0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef [ 0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f [ 0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041 [ 0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042 [ 0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c [ 0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84 [ 0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f [ 0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035 [ 0.029056] [ 0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.029297] Call trace: [ 0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to 0xffff80003d847c30) [ 0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000 ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678 [ 0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004 ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035 [ 0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88 ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778 [ 0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000 ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0 [ 0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000 000000000000017f 0000000000000000 [ 0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005 ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570 [ 0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40 0000000000000042 0000000000000006 [ 0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006 [ 0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f [ 0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20 [ 0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4 [ 0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130 [ 0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248 [ 0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100 [ 0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669 Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Commit 111e6b4 ("selftests/bpf: make test_verifier run most programs") enables tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier unit cases to run via bpf_prog_test_run command. With the latest code base, test_verifier had one test case failure: ... torvalds#473/p check deducing bounds from const, 2 FAIL retval 1 != 0 0: (b7) r0 = 1 1: (75) if r0 s>= 0x1 goto pc+1 R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 2: (95) exit from 1 to 3: R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 3: (d5) if r0 s<= 0x1 goto pc+1 R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 4: (95) exit from 3 to 5: R0=inv1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 5: (1f) r1 -= r0 6: (95) exit processed 7 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 0 ... The test case does not set return value in the test structure and hence the return value from the prog run is assumed to be 0. However, the actual return value is 1. As a result, the test failed. The fix is to correctly set the return value in the test structure. Fixes: 111e6b4 ("selftests/bpf: make test_verifier run most programs") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
commit 24d5373 upstream. The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment which are not power of two. However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case. Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two" introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present. This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two. [1] [ 0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation [ 0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.024584] Modules linked in: [ 0.024708] [ 0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473 [ 0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) [ 0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000 [ 0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>] pstate: 60000045 [ 0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0 [ 0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0 [ 0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010 [ 0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef [ 0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f [ 0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041 [ 0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042 [ 0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c [ 0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84 [ 0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f [ 0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035 [ 0.029056] [ 0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.029297] Call trace: [ 0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to 0xffff80003d847c30) [ 0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000 ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678 [ 0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004 ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035 [ 0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88 ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778 [ 0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000 ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0 [ 0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000 000000000000017f 0000000000000000 [ 0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005 ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570 [ 0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40 0000000000000042 0000000000000006 [ 0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006 [ 0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f [ 0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20 [ 0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4 [ 0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130 [ 0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248 [ 0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100 [ 0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669 Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 24d5373 upstream. The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment which are not power of two. However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case. Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two" introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present. This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two. [1] [ 0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation [ 0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.024584] Modules linked in: [ 0.024708] [ 0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473 [ 0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) [ 0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000 [ 0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>] pstate: 60000045 [ 0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0 [ 0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0 [ 0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010 [ 0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef [ 0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f [ 0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041 [ 0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042 [ 0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c [ 0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84 [ 0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f [ 0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035 [ 0.029056] [ 0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.029297] Call trace: [ 0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to 0xffff80003d847c30) [ 0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000 ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678 [ 0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004 ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035 [ 0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88 ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778 [ 0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000 ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0 [ 0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000 000000000000017f 0000000000000000 [ 0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005 ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570 [ 0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40 0000000000000042 0000000000000006 [ 0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006 [ 0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f [ 0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20 [ 0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4 [ 0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130 [ 0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248 [ 0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100 [ 0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669 Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850456 commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.kuehl@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
commit 77c3012 upstream. We have a test case like block/001 in blktests, which will create a scsi device by loading scsi_debug module and then try to delete the device by sysfs interface. At the same time, it may remove the scsi_debug module. And getting a invalid paging request BUG_ON as following: [ 34.625854] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffa0016bb8 [ 34.629189] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI [ 34.629618] CPU: 1 PID: 450 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 5.4.0-rc3+ torvalds#473 [ 34.632524] RIP: 0010:scsi_proc_hostdir_rm+0x5/0xa0 [ 34.643555] CR2: ffffffffa0016bb8 CR3: 000000012cd88000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 [ 34.644545] Call Trace: [ 34.644907] scsi_host_dev_release+0x6b/0x1f0 [ 34.645511] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.646046] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.646559] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.647041] scsi_target_dev_release+0x2b/0x40 [ 34.647652] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.648186] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.648691] put_device+0x17/0x30 [ 34.649157] scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext+0x2e8/0x360 [ 34.649953] execute_in_process_context+0x29/0x80 [ 34.650603] scsi_device_dev_release+0x20/0x30 [ 34.651221] device_release+0x74/0x110 [ 34.651732] kobject_put+0x116/0x390 [ 34.652230] sysfs_unbreak_active_protection+0x3f/0x50 [ 34.652935] sdev_store_delete.cold.4+0x71/0x8f [ 34.653579] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x40 [ 34.654103] sysfs_kf_write+0x3d/0x60 [ 34.654603] kernfs_fop_write+0x174/0x250 [ 34.655165] __vfs_write+0x1f/0x60 [ 34.655639] vfs_write+0xc7/0x280 [ 34.656117] ksys_write+0x6d/0x140 [ 34.656591] __x64_sys_write+0x1e/0x30 [ 34.657114] do_syscall_64+0xb1/0x400 [ 34.657627] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 34.658335] RIP: 0033:0x7f156f337130 During deleting scsi target, the scsi_debug module have been removed. Then, sdebug_driver_template belonged to the module cannot be accessd, resulting in scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() BUG_ON. To fix the bug, we add scsi_device_get() in sdev_store_delete() to try to increase refcount of module, avoiding the module been removed. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191015130556.18061-1-yuyufen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ Upstream commit 24d5373 ] The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment which are not power of two. However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case. Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two" introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present. This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two. [1] [ 0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation [ 0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.024584] Modules linked in: [ 0.024708] [ 0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473 [ 0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) [ 0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000 [ 0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>] pstate: 60000045 [ 0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0 [ 0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0 [ 0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010 [ 0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef [ 0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f [ 0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041 [ 0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042 [ 0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c [ 0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84 [ 0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f [ 0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035 [ 0.029056] [ 0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.029297] Call trace: [ 0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to 0xffff80003d847c30) [ 0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000 ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678 [ 0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004 ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035 [ 0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88 ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778 [ 0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000 ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0 [ 0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000 000000000000017f 0000000000000000 [ 0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005 ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570 [ 0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40 0000000000000042 0000000000000006 [ 0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006 [ 0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f [ 0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20 [ 0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4 [ 0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130 [ 0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248 [ 0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100 [ 0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669 Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
[ Upstream commit 24d5373 ] The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment which are not power of two. However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case. Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two" introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present. This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two. [1] [ 0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation [ 0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.024584] Modules linked in: [ 0.024708] [ 0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473 [ 0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) [ 0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000 [ 0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>] pstate: 60000045 [ 0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0 [ 0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0 [ 0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010 [ 0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef [ 0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f [ 0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041 [ 0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042 [ 0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c [ 0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84 [ 0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f [ 0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035 [ 0.029056] [ 0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.029297] Call trace: [ 0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to 0xffff80003d847c30) [ 0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000 ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678 [ 0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004 ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035 [ 0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88 ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778 [ 0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000 ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0 [ 0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000 000000000000017f 0000000000000000 [ 0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005 ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570 [ 0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40 0000000000000042 0000000000000006 [ 0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006 [ 0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f [ 0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20 [ 0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4 [ 0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130 [ 0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248 [ 0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100 [ 0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669 Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
My machine Oopsed while testing SCD30 sensor in interrupt driven mode: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000188 pgd = (ptrval) [00000188] *pgd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.4.96+ torvalds#473 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) PC is at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x4c LR is at devres_add+0x18/0x38 ... [<8070ecac>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<804916a8>] (devres_add+0x18/0x38) [<804916a8>] (devres_add) from [<805ef708>] (devm_iio_trigger_alloc+0x5c/0x7c) [<805ef708>] (devm_iio_trigger_alloc) from [<805f0a90>] (scd30_probe+0x1d4/0x3f0) [<805f0a90>] (scd30_probe) from [<805f10fc>] (scd30_i2c_probe+0x54/0x64) [<805f10fc>] (scd30_i2c_probe) from [<80583390>] (i2c_device_probe+0x150/0x278) [<80583390>] (i2c_device_probe) from [<8048e6c0>] (really_probe+0x1f8/0x360) I've found out, that it's due to missing parent/owner device in iio_dev struct which then leads to NULL pointer dereference during spinlock while registering the device resource via devres_add(). Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.9+ Fixes: 64b3d8b ("iio: chemical: scd30: add core driver") Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
…iner-of Don't hide unsafety in `$ptr` argument of `container_of!`
commit 24d5373 upstream. The function xen_guest_init is using __alloc_percpu with an alignment which are not power of two. However, the percpu allocator never supported alignments which are not power of two and has always behaved incorectly in thise case. Commit 3ca45a4 "percpu: ensure requested alignment is power of two" introduced a check which trigger a warning [1] when booting linux-next on Xen. But in reality this bug was always present. This can be fixed by replacing the call to __alloc_percpu with alloc_percpu. The latter will use an alignment which are a power of two. [1] [ 0.023921] illegal size (48) or align (48) for percpu allocation [ 0.024167] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.024344] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at linux/mm/percpu.c:892 pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.024584] Modules linked in: [ 0.024708] [ 0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 torvalds#473 [ 0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT) [ 0.025162] task: ffff80003d870000 task.stack: ffff80003d844000 [ 0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025490] LR is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.025624] pc : [<ffff00000818e678>] lr : [<ffff00000818e678>] pstate: 60000045 [ 0.025830] sp : ffff80003d847cd0 [ 0.025946] x29: ffff80003d847cd0 x28: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026147] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026348] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026549] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 00000000024000c0 [ 0.026752] x21: ffff000008e97000 x20: 0000000000000000 [ 0.026953] x19: 0000000000000030 x18: 0000000000000010 [ 0.027155] x17: 0000000000000a3f x16: 00000000deadbeef [ 0.027357] x15: 0000000000000006 x14: ffff000088f79c3f [ 0.027573] x13: ffff000008f79c4d x12: 0000000000000041 [ 0.027782] x11: 0000000000000006 x10: 0000000000000042 [ 0.027995] x9 : ffff80003d847a40 x8 : 6f697461636f6c6c [ 0.028208] x7 : 6120757063726570 x6 : ffff000008f79c84 [ 0.028419] x5 : 0000000000000005 x4 : 0000000000000000 [ 0.028628] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 000000000000017f [ 0.028840] x1 : ffff80003d870000 x0 : 0000000000000035 [ 0.029056] [ 0.029152] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [ 0.029297] Call trace: [ 0.029403] Exception stack(0xffff80003d847b00 to 0xffff80003d847c30) [ 0.029621] 7b00: 0000000000000030 0001000000000000 ffff80003d847cd0 ffff00000818e678 [ 0.029901] 7b20: 0000000000000002 0000000000000004 ffff000008f7c060 0000000000000035 [ 0.030153] 7b40: ffff000008f79000 ffff000008c4cd88 ffff80003d847bf0 ffff000008101778 [ 0.030402] 7b60: 0000000000000030 0000000000000000 ffff000008e97000 00000000024000c0 [ 0.030647] 7b80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 0.030895] 7ba0: 0000000000000035 ffff80003d870000 000000000000017f 0000000000000000 [ 0.031144] 7bc0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000005 ffff000008f79c84 6120757063726570 [ 0.031394] 7be0: 6f697461636f6c6c ffff80003d847a40 0000000000000042 0000000000000006 [ 0.031643] 7c00: 0000000000000041 ffff000008f79c4d ffff000088f79c3f 0000000000000006 [ 0.031877] 7c20: 00000000deadbeef 0000000000000a3f [ 0.032051] [<ffff00000818e678>] pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0 [ 0.032229] [<ffff00000818ece8>] __alloc_percpu+0x18/0x20 [ 0.032409] [<ffff000008d9606c>] xen_guest_init+0x174/0x2f4 [ 0.032591] [<ffff0000080830f8>] do_one_initcall+0x38/0x130 [ 0.032783] [<ffff000008d90c34>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe0/0x248 [ 0.032995] [<ffff00000899a890>] kernel_init+0x10/0x100 [ 0.033172] [<ffff000008082ec0>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50 Reported-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/28/669 Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Add a test which attempts to call bpf_check_mtu() and writes the MTU into .rodata section of the BPF program, and for comparison this adds test cases also for .bss and .data section again. The bpf_check_mtu() is a bit more special in that the passed mtu argument is read and written by the helper (instead of just written to). Assert that writes into .rodata remain rejected by the verifier. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const [...] ./test_progs -t verifier_const [ 1.657367] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.657773] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel torvalds#473/1 verifier_const/rodata/strtol: write rejected:OK torvalds#473/2 verifier_const/bss/strtol: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/3 verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/4 verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:OK torvalds#473/5 verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/6 verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473 verifier_const:OK [...] Summary: 2/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED For comparison, without the MEM_UNINIT on bpf_check_mtu's proto: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const [...] torvalds#473/3 verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK run_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec run_subtest:FAIL:unexpected_load_success unexpected success: 0 torvalds#473/4 verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:FAIL torvalds#473/5 verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/6 verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473 verifier_const:FAIL [...] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Add a test which attempts to call bpf_check_mtu() and writes the MTU into .rodata section of the BPF program, and for comparison this adds test cases also for .bss and .data section again. The bpf_check_mtu() is a bit more special in that the passed mtu argument is read and written by the helper (instead of just written to). Assert that writes into .rodata remain rejected by the verifier. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const [...] ./test_progs -t verifier_const [ 1.657367] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.657773] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel torvalds#473/1 verifier_const/rodata/strtol: write rejected:OK torvalds#473/2 verifier_const/bss/strtol: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/3 verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/4 verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:OK torvalds#473/5 verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/6 verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473 verifier_const:OK [...] Summary: 2/10 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED For comparison, without the MEM_UNINIT on bpf_check_mtu's proto: # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t verifier_const [...] torvalds#473/3 verifier_const/data/strtol: write accepted:OK run_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec run_subtest:FAIL:unexpected_load_success unexpected success: 0 torvalds#473/4 verifier_const/rodata/mtu: write rejected:FAIL torvalds#473/5 verifier_const/bss/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473/6 verifier_const/data/mtu: write accepted:OK torvalds#473 verifier_const:FAIL [...] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-9-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Why the logical &&?
Would like to add this will lead to problems when p->ifindex = 0.