tornado.ioloop.IOLoop.instance() should be threadsafe #497
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bdarnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2012
tornado.ioloop.IOLoop.instance() should be threadsafe
Rudd-O
pushed a commit
to Rudd-O/tornado
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2013
tornado.ioloop.IOLoop.instance() should be threadsafe
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
tornado.ioloop.IOLoop.instance()should be threadsafe (for example -- using pattern "double-checked locking")if
tornado.ioloop.IOLoop.instance()will NOT be threadsafe, then next function will be NOT threadsafe too:so, despite the fact that
add_callback()is threadsafe -- there is no simple way to useadd_callback()from other threadpattern "double-checked locking" -- will not reduce speed of access to instance