Skip to content

Conversation

@andrzej-bieniek
Copy link

Hi,

Would you consider merging in remote sensors support?
It was tested with two remote sensors pushing temperature data with http GET call.
There is a bit more info in README.md file.

Thanks.

Log screenshot with two remote sensors:
tworemotesensors

Log screenshot with default data (after running ./build_example_database.sh)
defaultdbplot

No logic chages in the code.
What was done:
$ git clone https://github.com/einars/js-beautify.git
$ $ git describe
v1.4.2-11-gf416b0b
$ cd PiThermServer
$ ../js-beautify/python/js-beautify server.js > server.js.new
$ mv server.js.new server.js
It allows to run the server without local sensor.
(Error is printed to the console)
Script creates database with data from removed sample_dabatase.db
Sample data were dumped to text file with:
$ sqlite3 sample_database.db '.dump' > example_database.sql
No logic changes in the code.
$ html-beautify --version
1.4.2
$ html-beautify temperature_plot.htm > temperature_plot.htm.new
$ html-beautify temperature_log.htm > temperature_log.htm.new
$ mv temperature_plot.htm.new temperature_plot.htm
$ mv temperature_log.htm.new temperature_log.htm
It brings support for multiple remote sensors configured in database.
Local sensor support is not changed (sensor_id=0 is used for local sensor).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants