Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2018. It is now read-only.

Add explicit definitions from Geek Feminsim #17

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 29, 2015
33 changes: 31 additions & 2 deletions index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,35 @@ Our open source community strives to:
* Repeated harassment of others. In general, if someone asks you to stop, then stop.
* **When we disagree, try to understand why**: Disagreements, both social and technical, happen all the time. It is important that we resolve disagreements and differing views constructively. Remember that we’re different. The strength of our community comes from its diversity, people from a wide range of backgrounds. Different people have different perspectives on issues. Being unable to understand why someone holds a viewpoint doesn’t mean that they’re wrong. Don’t forget that it is human to err and blaming each other doesn’t get us anywhere. Instead, focus on helping to resolve issues and learning from mistakes.

This code is not exhaustive or complete. It serves to distill our common understanding of a collaborative, shared environment, and goals. We expect it to be followed in spirit as much as in the letter.
## Definitions
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this is to be deleted completely. The last sentence provides valuable guidance for the interpretation of the CoC.


Harassment includes:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"but is not limited to"


- Offensive comments related to gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, mental illness, neuro(a)typicality, physical appearance, body size, race, age, or religion
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This list should include political affiliation and regional discrimination.

- Unwelcome comments regarding a person’s lifestyle choices and practices, including those related to food, health, parenting, drugs, and employment.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probs don't need the period at the end of this.

- Deliberate misgendering or use of ‘dead’ or rejected names
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rephrase or expand in a clearer language. What does this "dead or rejected names" even mean?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As previously commented, this still should be elaborated.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@stephbwills you are a word smith - could you please help me elaborate on this?

How about

Deliberate misgendering. This includes persistently using an incorrect pronoun to describe a person.

I'm worried about use of the word 'incorrect' here. I want it to be clear that the person being addressed get's to decide what is correct or not. Thoughts?

or use of ‘dead’ or rejected names. When addressing someone, you must use the name that they feel comfortable being addressed as.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or maybe "request to be addressed as", since it's impossible to read the minds of someone as to their comfort.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Related to #29

And I do agree with @searls - people are generally no mind readers, hence, this should include some form of "on request".

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ammeep I feel like the use of "deliberate" covers the cases in which people just get it wrong. I've seen "incorrect" or "wrong" pronoun before, but I made a suggestion below. I also think "on request" puts the onus entirely on the person who was misgendered to make the correction. What about:

Deliberate misgendering. This includes deadnaming or persistently using a pronoun that does not correctly reflect a person's gender identity. You must address people by the name they give you when not addressing them by their username or handle.

Also added the bit about handle/username to make it a bit more applicable to the context. Would be good to get some additional community feedback on these definitions, too.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds a lot better and clear. However, the term "‘dead’ or rejected names" is still not explained - the terminology used should be reasonably clear. After spending quite some time searching for definition to this term, I am yet to discover one, hence, this is not clear at all.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

More information on deadnaming is available by google search.

I sort of feel that if you see something you're unfamiliar with in a CoC, you should check it out, but that's just me. I updated my comment above with "deadnaming," which appears better indexed for search, even if it provides fewer context clues. That's about as far as I'm willing to go, though, without additional input.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Problem with "checking it out" is ambiguity - if there is something to be stated, it must be stated clearly enough to provide reasonable understanding - in best case scenario, without spending hours googling for badly indexed terminology. :) Plus, I might end up finding definition which is not intended in the given reference.

Maybe we could include some sort of glossary with broader explanations for these terms? What do you think?

- Gratuitous or off-topic sexual images or behaviour in spaces where they’re not appropriate
- Physical contact and simulated physical contact (eg, textual descriptions like “*hug*” or “*backrub*”) without consent or after a request to stop.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment as above, different period 😁

- Threats of violence
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This could be expanded. For example, "Threats of violence, both physical and psychological"

- Incitement of violence towards any individual, including encouraging a person to commit suicide or to engage in self-harm
- Deliberate intimidation
- Stalking or following
- Harassing photography or recording, including logging online activity for harassment purposes
- Sustained disruption of discussion
- Unwelcome sexual attention

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're concerned about brevity, it seems like we can roll this one up with one of the bullet points above. Like:

Unwelcome sexual attention, including gratuitous or off-topic sexual images or behaviour in spaces where they’re not appropriate

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I second this, would make it broader and more clear. As a sidenote, I fail to imagine where such actions would be appropriate if taken in to context of professional environment.

- Pattern of inappropriate social contact, such as requesting/assuming inappropriate levels of intimacy with others
- Continued one-on-one communication after requests to cease
- Deliberate “outing” of any aspect of a person’s identity without their consent except as necessary to protect other GF members or other vulnerable people from intentional abuse
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reference to Geek Feminism should be removed or replaced with [COMMUNITY]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yah, could be:

Deliberate “outing” of any aspect of a person’s identity without their consent except as necessary to protect people from intentional abuse

- Publication of non-harassing private communication

Our open source community prioritizes marginalized people’s safety over privileged people’s comfort. The **[COMMUNITY]** community leaders will not act on complaints regarding:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first statement is group-exclusive and can be interpreted as discrimination against particular groups. It should be either clarified, or removed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here as previously, can we remove the [COMMUNITY] placeholder here?

We will not act on complaints regarding:

or

Complaints regarding the following will not be acted upon:


- ‘Reverse’ -isms, including ‘reverse racism,’ ‘reverse sexism,’ and ‘cisphobia’ (because these things don’t exist)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Highly opinionated and constitutes exclusionism of certain, valid issues (forced point of view).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The feedback we've heard this week overwhelmingly has suggested adding reverse-isms. I agree that this is important to add, but "because these things don't exist" feels snarky and unnecessary.

- Reasonable communication of boundaries, such as “leave me alone,” “go away,” or “I’m not discussing this with you.”
- Refusal to explain or debate social justice concepts
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concepts are to be explained and debated, that is why they are concepts, not facts. I don't believe this has anything to do with CoC.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Addvilz This is only saying that the refusal to debate is not a violation of the code of conduct. I feel like that is reasonable to include.

- Communicating in a ‘tone’ you don’t find congenial
- Criticizing racist, sexist, cissexist, or otherwise oppressive behavior or assumptions


### Diversity Statement

Expand All @@ -42,4 +70,5 @@ include them as well. Your account of what occurred, and if you believe the inci

After filing a report, a representative will contact you personally. If the person who is harassing you is part of the response team, they will recuse themselves from handling your incident. A representative will then review the incident, follow up with any additional questions, and make a decision as to how to respond. We will respect confidentiality requests for the purpose of protecting victims of abuse.

Anyone asked to stop unacceptable behavior is expected to comply immediately. If an individual engages in unacceptable behavior, the representative may take any action they deem appropriate, up to and including a permanent ban from our community without warning.
## Consequences
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO we can drop this section, it's pretty clear from the first paragraph what the consequences will be: "We are committed to providing a welcoming and inspiring community for all and expect our code of conduct to be honored. Anyone who violates this code of conduct may be banned from the community"

Participants asked to stop any harassing behavior are expected to comply immediately. If an individual engages in unacceptable behavior, the representative may take any action they deem appropriate, up to and including a permanent ban from our community without warning.