Fix reversed assertEquals parameter order in Long modification tests #237
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixed incorrect parameter order in assertEquals calls where the actual value was placed before the expected value. The JUnit convention expects the expected value as the first parameter. Added 'L' suffix to numeric literals to ensure proper Long type matching. Related to tls-attacker/TLS-Attacker-Development#1321
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Changes
src/test/java/de/rub/nds/modifiablevariable/mlong/LongAddModificationTest.javasrc/test/java/de/rub/nds/modifiablevariable/mlong/LongExplicitValueModificationTest.javaRelated Issue
Related to tls-attacker/TLS-Attacker-Development#1321
Test Plan
mvn spotless:apply