Skip to content

Conversation

@EiffL
Copy link

@EiffL EiffL commented Jan 5, 2022

It's arguable whether you want this or not ^^. But I'm a big fan of Probabilistic Programming Languages, so even if not directly embeded in the library it would be good to be able to have a way of accessing the latent variables of the model

@tlmakinen
Copy link
Owner

This is a great idea ! For the IMNN applications I was only interested in crunching the fields, but it would be great to have a numpyro branch handy -- I can see what Stephen thinks since we're trying to integrate the differentiable powerbox with the original

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants