DO NOT MERGE - TINYDOC-3514 link check verification - #4317
Closed
kemister85 wants to merge 3 commits into
Closed
Conversation
kemister85
requested review from
MitchC1999,
ShiridiGandham and
tiny-ben-tran
and removed request for
a team
August 20, 2026 01:33
kemister85
force-pushed
the
test/TINYDOC-3514-link-check-proof
branch
from
August 20, 2026 01:38
1656b4f to
f4bbbde
Compare
kemister85
force-pushed
the
hotfix/8/TINYDOC-3514
branch
from
August 20, 2026 02:18
7d7002f to
811caf6
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Verification complete: the built-HTML link check reported 1 of the 2 dead links added — the prose anchor — and correctly ignored the code-block twin plus the five other code-sample URLs. Evidence is recorded in #4277. Closing; this page was never for merge. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Throwaway pull request that exercises the automated external-link check in #4277. Not for merge — close once the run is confirmed.
Base is the #4277 head so the new workflow is the one that runs.
Expected outcome in the job summary:
developer.mozilla.org/.../TinyDoc3514DoesNotExist(prose)w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.2/developer.mozilla.org/.../Window/postMessagexref:events.adocwww.tiny.cloud/docs/...npmjs.com/package/tinymce[source,js]blockThe last row is the point of the exercise: the previous extractor read raw AsciiDoc and would have checked all six.