Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

checker: fix the too many orphan peers cannot be removed (#6574) #6575

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 7 additions & 0 deletions server/schedule/checker/rule_checker.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -427,11 +427,18 @@ loopFits:
// If hasUnhealthyFit is true, try to remove unhealthy orphan peers only if number of OrphanPeers is >= 2.
// Ref https://github.com/tikv/pd/issues/4045
if len(fit.OrphanPeers) >= 2 {
hasHealthPeer := false
for _, orphanPeer := range fit.OrphanPeers {
if isUnhealthyPeer(orphanPeer.GetId()) {
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
return operator.CreateRemovePeerOperator("remove-orphan-peer", c.cluster, 0, region, orphanPeer.StoreId)
}
if hasHealthPeer {
// there already exists a healthy orphan peer, so we can remove other orphan Peers.
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
return operator.CreateRemovePeerOperator("remove-orphan-peer", c.cluster, 0, region, orphanPeer.StoreId)
}
hasHealthPeer = true
}
}
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "skip-remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
Expand Down
47 changes: 41 additions & 6 deletions server/schedule/checker/rule_checker_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -167,6 +167,39 @@ func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixOrphanPeers() {
suite.Equal(uint64(4), op.Step(0).(operator.RemovePeer).FromStore)
}

func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixToManyOrphanPeers() {
suite.cluster.AddLeaderStore(1, 1)
suite.cluster.AddLeaderStore(2, 1)
suite.cluster.AddLeaderStore(3, 1)
suite.cluster.AddLeaderStore(4, 1)
suite.cluster.AddLeaderStore(5, 1)
suite.cluster.AddLeaderStore(6, 1)
suite.cluster.AddRegionWithLearner(1, 1, []uint64{2, 3}, []uint64{4, 5, 6})
// Case1:
// store 4, 5, 6 are orphan peers, and peer on store 3 is pending and down peer.
region := suite.cluster.GetRegion(1)
region = region.Clone(
core.WithDownPeers([]*pdpb.PeerStats{{Peer: region.GetStorePeer(3), DownSeconds: 60000}}),
core.WithPendingPeers([]*metapb.Peer{region.GetStorePeer(3)}))
suite.cluster.PutRegion(region)
op := suite.rc.Check(suite.cluster.GetRegion(1))
suite.NotNil(op)
suite.Equal("remove-orphan-peer", op.Desc())
suite.Equal(uint64(5), op.Step(0).(operator.RemovePeer).FromStore)

// Case2:
// store 4, 5, 6 are orphan peers, and peer on store 3 is down peer. and peer on store 4, 5 are pending.
region = suite.cluster.GetRegion(1)
region = region.Clone(
core.WithDownPeers([]*pdpb.PeerStats{{Peer: region.GetStorePeer(3), DownSeconds: 60000}}),
core.WithPendingPeers([]*metapb.Peer{region.GetStorePeer(4), region.GetStorePeer(5)}))
suite.cluster.PutRegion(region)
op = suite.rc.Check(suite.cluster.GetRegion(1))
suite.NotNil(op)
suite.Equal("remove-orphan-peer", op.Desc())
suite.Equal(uint64(4), op.Step(0).(operator.RemovePeer).FromStore)
}

func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixOrphanPeers2() {
// check orphan peers can only be handled when all rules are satisfied.
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(1, 1, map[string]string{"foo": "bar"})
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -311,7 +344,7 @@ func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixRuleWitness() {
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(1, 1, map[string]string{"A": "leader"})
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(2, 1, map[string]string{"B": "follower"})
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(3, 1, map[string]string{"C": "voter"})
suite.cluster.AddLeaderRegion(1, 1, 2)
suite.cluster.AddLeaderRegion(1, 1)

suite.ruleManager.SetRule(&placement.Rule{
GroupID: "pd",
Expand All @@ -328,6 +361,7 @@ func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixRuleWitness() {
op := suite.rc.Check(suite.cluster.GetRegion(1))
suite.NotNil(op)
suite.Equal("add-rule-peer", op.Desc())
fmt.Println(op)
suite.Equal(uint64(3), op.Step(0).(operator.AddLearner).ToStore)
suite.True(op.Step(0).(operator.AddLearner).IsWitness)
}
Expand All @@ -336,24 +370,25 @@ func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixRuleWitness2() {
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(1, 1, map[string]string{"A": "leader"})
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(2, 1, map[string]string{"B": "voter"})
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(3, 1, map[string]string{"C": "voter"})
suite.cluster.AddLeaderRegion(1, 1, 2, 3)
suite.cluster.AddLabelsStore(4, 1, map[string]string{"D": "voter"})
suite.cluster.AddLeaderRegion(1, 1, 2, 3, 4)

suite.ruleManager.SetRule(&placement.Rule{
GroupID: "pd",
ID: "r1",
Index: 100,
Override: true,
Override: false,
Role: placement.Voter,
Count: 1,
IsWitness: true,
LabelConstraints: []placement.LabelConstraint{
{Key: "C", Op: "in", Values: []string{"voter"}},
{Key: "D", Op: "in", Values: []string{"voter"}},
},
})
op := suite.rc.Check(suite.cluster.GetRegion(1))
suite.NotNil(op)
suite.Equal("fix-witness-peer", op.Desc())
suite.Equal(uint64(3), op.Step(0).(operator.BecomeWitness).StoreID)
suite.Equal(uint64(4), op.Step(0).(operator.BecomeWitness).StoreID)
}

func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixRuleWitness3() {
Expand All @@ -365,7 +400,7 @@ func (suite *ruleCheckerTestSuite) TestFixRuleWitness3() {
r := suite.cluster.GetRegion(1)
// set peer3 to witness
r = r.Clone(core.WithWitnesses([]*metapb.Peer{r.GetPeer(3)}))

suite.cluster.PutRegion(r)
op := suite.rc.Check(r)
suite.NotNil(op)
suite.Equal("fix-non-witness-peer", op.Desc())
Expand Down