Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

placement: do not delete orphan peers if some peers selected by RuleFit is down or pending (#4067) #4074

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
17 changes: 16 additions & 1 deletion server/schedule/checker/rule_checker.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -269,12 +269,27 @@ func (c *RuleChecker) fixOrphanPeers(region *core.RegionInfo, fit *placement.Reg
if len(fit.OrphanPeers) == 0 {
return nil, nil
}
// remove orphan peers only when all rules are satisfied (count+role)
// remove orphan peers only when all rules are satisfied (count+role) and all peers selected
// by RuleFits is not pending or down.
for _, rf := range fit.RuleFits {
if !rf.IsSatisfied() {
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "skip-remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
return nil, nil
}
for _, p := range rf.Peers {
for _, pendingPeer := range region.GetPendingPeers() {
if pendingPeer.Id == p.Id {
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "skip-remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
return nil, nil
}
}
for _, downPeer := range region.GetDownPeers() {
if downPeer.Peer.Id == p.Id {
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "skip-remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
return nil, nil
}
}
}
}
checkerCounter.WithLabelValues("rule_checker", "remove-orphan-peer").Inc()
peer := fit.OrphanPeers[0]
Expand Down
42 changes: 42 additions & 0 deletions server/schedule/checker/rule_checker_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -600,3 +600,45 @@ func (s *testRuleCheckerSuite) TestFixOfflinePeer(c *C) {
s.ruleManager.SetRule(rule)
c.Assert(s.rc.Check(region), IsNil)
}

// Ref https://github.com/tikv/pd/issues/4045
func (s *testRuleCheckerSuite) TestSkipFixOrphanPeerIfSelectedPeerisPendingOrDown(c *C) {
s.cluster.AddLabelsStore(1, 1, map[string]string{"host": "host1"})
s.cluster.AddLabelsStore(2, 1, map[string]string{"host": "host1"})
s.cluster.AddLabelsStore(3, 1, map[string]string{"host": "host2"})
s.cluster.AddLabelsStore(4, 1, map[string]string{"host": "host4"})
s.cluster.AddLeaderRegionWithRange(1, "", "", 1, 2, 3, 4)

// set peer3 and peer4 to pending
r1 := s.cluster.GetRegion(1)
r1 = r1.Clone(core.WithPendingPeers([]*metapb.Peer{r1.GetStorePeer(3), r1.GetStorePeer(4)}))
s.cluster.PutRegion(r1)

// should not remove extra peer
op := s.rc.Check(s.cluster.GetRegion(1))
c.Assert(op, IsNil)

// set peer3 to down-peer
r1 = r1.Clone(core.WithPendingPeers([]*metapb.Peer{r1.GetStorePeer(4)}))
r1 = r1.Clone(core.WithDownPeers([]*pdpb.PeerStats{
{
Peer: r1.GetStorePeer(3),
DownSeconds: 42,
},
}))
s.cluster.PutRegion(r1)

// should not remove extra peer
op = s.rc.Check(s.cluster.GetRegion(1))
c.Assert(op, IsNil)

// set peer3 to normal
r1 = r1.Clone(core.WithDownPeers(nil))
s.cluster.PutRegion(r1)

// should remove extra peer now
var remove operator.RemovePeer
op = s.rc.Check(s.cluster.GetRegion(1))
c.Assert(op.Step(0), FitsTypeOf, remove)
c.Assert(op.Desc(), Equals, "remove-orphan-peer")
}