Skip to content

Conversation

@lcwangchao
Copy link
Contributor

@lcwangchao lcwangchao commented Jan 26, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected test validation logic in transaction commit timeout handling to properly capture and verify expected values.
  • Documentation

    • Updated API documentation to clarify the return value behavior when accessing missing keys.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Signed-off-by: Chao Wang <cclcwangchao@hotmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the dco. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 26, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Two minor updates: a test fix where a variable assignment replaces a discarded value in TestFailCommitTimeout, and a documentation comment update for Getter.Get clarifying that missing keys return an empty ValueEntry instead of nil.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Test Fix
integration_tests/2pc_test.go
Changed second txn2.Get(...) call to assign result to value variable instead of discarding with _, overwriting the previous "a" value retrieval
Documentation Update
kv/kv.go
Updated Getter.Get interface comment to reflect that missing keys return an empty ValueEntry with ErrNotExist, rather than nil with ErrNotExist

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A test got fixed with care so bright,
Docs now gleam with truthful light,
Empty values now declare their name,
Variables assigned, all set aflame! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the pull request as fixing a comment and a test mistake across multiple files.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Jan 26, 2026
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 26, 2026

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2026-01-26 09:43:10.434685057 +0000 UTC m=+1005418.048641913: ☑️ agreed by cfzjywxk.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the approved label Jan 26, 2026
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 26, 2026

@wfxr: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Jan 26, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cfzjywxk, wfxr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the dco. needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants