Error from conflicting `fzf` installation presumptions

[dcalhoun]

Similar to #778, the recent changes in #767 now cause an error if fzf is not installed via Homebrew specifically:

/Users/[REDACTED]/.zsh/configs/fzf.zsh:3: no such file or directory: /opt/homebrew/bin/fzf

Prior to #767, there was no expectation that fzf was installed via Homebrew. The vimrc.bundles logic includes fallback installation of fzf:

dotfiles/vimrc.bundles

Lines 20 to 30 in 0d19f52

	" If fzf has already been installed via Homebrew, use the existing fzf
	" Otherwise, install fzf. The `--all` flag makes fzf accessible outside of vim
	if executable("brew")
	let g:brew_fzf_path = trim(system("brew --prefix fzf"))
	endif
	if exists("g:brew_fzf_path") && isdirectory(g:brew_fzf_path)
	Plug g:brew_fzf_path
	else
	Plug 'junegunn/fzf', { 'dir': '~/.fzf', 'do': './install --all' }
	endif

But the new changes in #767 presume it is installed via Homebrew:

dotfiles/zsh/configs/fzf.zsh

Lines 1 to 3 in 0d19f52

	#!/usr/bin/env zsh
	source <(/opt/homebrew/bin/fzf --zsh)

[purinkle]

@dcalhoun, thank you for your question and contribution

dotfiles is a companion to thoughtbot's laptop script

Because of that, we expect that you would install fzf using that script and Homebrew

[dcalhoun]

Because of that, we expect that you would install fzf using that script and Homebrew

Thanks for the clarification, @purinkle. I suggest clearly documenting that requirement/prerequisite if that is the case. It would likely mitigate confusion.

[purinkle]

@dcalhoun, good catch!

I thought we had said that. Oops.

How do you feel about updating the README?

[purinkle]

@dcalhoun, I've thought about this

My expectations are unrealistic, given how folks use dotfiles

I will investigate this issue and determine how we could resolve it