Skip to content

Conversation

@thomhurst
Copy link
Owner

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Polyfill nuget major 8.9.1 -> 9.0.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@thomhurst thomhurst added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file MAJOR renovate-bot labels Nov 11, 2025
@thomhurst thomhurst enabled auto-merge (squash) November 11, 2025 23:37
@claude
Copy link
Contributor

claude bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job


Code Review Complete

Reviewing the Polyfill dependency update from v8.9.1 to v9.0.0:

Todo List

  • Read the changed file to understand the update
  • Check repository guidelines in CLAUDE.md
  • Analyze potential breaking changes from major version bump
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

Review Feedback

✅ Code Quality and Best Practices

The change is minimal and well-structured:

  • File: TUnit.Core/TUnit.Core.targets:11 - Updates _TUnitPolyfillVersion from 8.9.1 to 9.0.0
  • Scope: Only affects projects targeting netstandard2.0, netstandard2.1, or .NETFramework
  • Implementation: Properly uses MSBuild properties and conditional logic
  • Integration: Handles both CPM (Central Package Management) and non-CPM scenarios correctly

⚠️ Potential Issues & Considerations

Major Version Bump Concerns:

  • This is a major version upgrade (8.x → 9.x), which typically indicates breaking changes
  • However, since Polyfill is a compile-time only dependency (<PrivateAssets>all</PrivateAssets>), runtime impact is minimal
  • The package only affects compilation for older target frameworks that need modern C# features

Recommended Actions:

  1. Test compilation with projects targeting the affected frameworks (netstandard2.0/2.1, .NET Framework)
  2. Verify source generator tests pass since this could affect generated code for older targets
  3. Check CI/CD pipeline to ensure all target frameworks build successfully

🔒 Security Concerns

  • Low risk: Polyfill is a well-maintained Microsoft-ecosystem package by Simon Cropp
  • Compile-time only: No runtime dependencies are introduced
  • Scope limited: Only affects legacy target frameworks

⚡ Performance Considerations

  • Positive impact: Newer versions often include performance improvements
  • No runtime overhead: Package assets are excluded from runtime (<ExcludeAssets>runtime; native; contentfiles; build; buildtransitive</ExcludeAssets>)
  • Build time: May improve compilation performance for older target frameworks

🧪 Test Coverage

Recommendations:

  • Run the full test suite with dotnet test to ensure no compilation issues
  • Pay special attention to projects using older target frameworks
  • Consider testing with dotnet build across all TFMs

TUnit-Specific Testing:

  • Source generator tests should pass: dotnet test TUnit.Core.SourceGenerator.Tests
  • No snapshot updates should be needed since this is a build-time dependency change

Summary

This is a low-risk dependency update that should be safe to merge. The Polyfill package is well-maintained and only affects compilation for legacy target frameworks. The change follows TUnit's MSBuild conventions properly.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve - but verify CI passes and consider manual testing on older target frameworks.


@thomhurst thomhurst merged commit c265d8c into main Nov 12, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@thomhurst thomhurst deleted the renovate/major-_tunitpolyfillversion branch November 12, 2025 00:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file MAJOR renovate-bot

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants