-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
feat: add diagnostics for abstract test classes with data sources #3286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Claude finished @thomhurst's task —— View job 🔍 PR Review: Add diagnostics for abstract test classes with data sourcesI've completed a thorough review of this PR that adds analyzer rule TUnit0059. Here's my comprehensive feedback: ✅ Overall Assessment: Excellent ImplementationThis is a well-designed analyzer that addresses a real usability issue. The implementation is clean, comprehensive, and follows TUnit's established patterns. 📋 Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Excellent:
✅ Good error messaging:
🧪 Test Coverage: Comprehensive✅ Excellent test coverage with 6 test scenarios:
Test quality highlights:
🔧 Integration & Infrastructure✅ Proper integration:
⚡ Performance Considerations✅ Performance optimized:
Potential micro-optimization (very minor): // Current: Creates list then checks if empty
var testMethods = namedTypeSymbol.GetMembers()
.OfType<IMethodSymbol>()
.Where(m => m.IsTestMethod(context.Compilation))
.ToList();
// Alternative: Short-circuit without allocation
if (!namedTypeSymbol.GetMembers()
.OfType<IMethodSymbol>()
.Any(m => m.IsTestMethod(context.Compilation)))
{
return;
}🔒 Security Assessment✅ No security concerns:
🐛 Potential Issues FoundThe current detection logic at lines 69-79 uses string-based matching: if (typeName.Contains("DataSource") || typeName == "ArgumentsAttribute")
{
return true;
}Recommendation: Consider using the same robust detection pattern as ✅ Good news: The current approach works correctly for all TUnit built-in attributes and the tests verify this. 📈 Code Consistency✅ Excellent consistency:
🎯 Recommendations
✅ Final VerdictThis is a high-quality implementation that:
Recommendation: ✅ Approve - This PR is ready to merge. The suggested improvements are minor optimizations that don't affect functionality. |
Fixes #2768