[SDK] Refactor: More Viem to Ox migration

[gregfromstl]

Problem solved

Short description of the bug fixed or feature added

---

PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on replacing instances of maxUint256 imported from viem with maxUint256 from ox/Solidity, along with some adjustments in the workflow configuration and type definitions.

Detailed summary

• Updated imports for maxUint256 from viem to ox/Solidity in multiple files.
• Modified .github/workflows/auto-assign.yml to include ready_for_review and draft in the pull_request triggers.
• Changed type definitions in various files to use types from ox packages.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
docs-v2	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Dec 23, 2024 11:19pm
thirdweb_playground	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Dec 23, 2024 11:19pm
thirdweb-www	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Dec 23, 2024 11:19pm
wallet-ui	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Dec 23, 2024 11:19pm

[graphite-app]

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• merge-queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: a9887a1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

size-limit report 📦

Path	Size	Loading time (3g)	Running time (snapdragon)	Total time
thirdweb (esm)	45.84 KB (+2% 🔺)	917 ms (+2% 🔺)	770 ms (-79.37% 🔽)	1.7 s
thirdweb (cjs)	114.03 KB (+2.88% 🔺)	2.3 s (+2.88% 🔺)	1.7 s (-83.27% 🔽)	3.9 s
thirdweb (minimal + tree-shaking)	5.58 KB (0%)	112 ms (0%)	200 ms (+5.59% 🔺)	311 ms
thirdweb/chains (tree-shaking)	506 B (0%)	10 ms (0%)	67 ms (-19.82% 🔽)	77 ms
thirdweb/react (minimal + tree-shaking)	19.1 KB (+0.14% 🔺)	382 ms (+0.14% 🔺)	196 ms (-80.3% 🔽)	578 ms

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.11111% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 53.02%. Comparing base (7d8566e) to head (36de96f).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/thirdweb/src/auth/verify-signature.ts	31.03%	20 Missing ⚠️
packages/thirdweb/src/auth/verify-hash.ts	54.54%	5 Missing ⚠️
...ages/thirdweb/src/utils/abi/encodeAbiParameters.ts	92.85%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5790      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   53.02%   53.02%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1101     1101              
  Lines       59080    59122      +42     
  Branches     4810     4811       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        31328    31349      +21     
- Misses      27034    27055      +21     
  Partials      718      718              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
legacy_packages	65.68% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 70a6bd4
packages	50.16% <71.11%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
packages/thirdweb/src/auth/is-erc6492-signature.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...kages/thirdweb/src/auth/parse-erc6492-signature.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/thirdweb/src/auth/verify-typed-data.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../src/contract/deployment/utils/create-2-factory.ts	69.23% <100.00%> (+2.71%)	⬆️
...ges/thirdweb/src/extensions/ens/resolve-l2-name.ts	90.90% <100.00%> (+2.02%)	⬆️
...es/thirdweb/src/extensions/erc1155/read/getNFTs.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...es/thirdweb/src/extensions/erc1155/write/mintTo.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...irdweb/src/extensions/erc1155/write/mintToBatch.ts	93.10% <100.00%> (ø)
...s/thirdweb/src/extensions/erc1155/write/sigMint.ts	95.19% <ø> (ø)
...ons/modules/ClaimableERC1155/setClaimConditions.ts	97.18% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 7 more

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[joaquim-verges]

this seems a bit scary? maybe add tests for these sub cases?

[gregfromstl]

Added a few tests and removed signature object support (we can't support it until we re-add 1271 support. What's scary about it though? It's just parsing the input to the format we prefer