Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Redmine Issue Link to Description #1

Closed
edoceo opened this issue Mar 9, 2012 · 6 comments
Closed

Add Redmine Issue Link to Description #1

edoceo opened this issue Mar 9, 2012 · 6 comments

Comments

@edoceo
Copy link

edoceo commented Mar 9, 2012

It would be awesome if the link in the ics description field had a link back to the redmine issue so that when viewing my calendar I can jump quickly.

@edoceo
Copy link
Author

edoceo commented Mar 9, 2012

At or about line #62 of lib/redmine_ical/patch_redmine_classes.rb

              description   "#{e[:description]}\n\n#{e[:url]}"

@thegcat
Copy link
Owner

thegcat commented Mar 10, 2012

Calendar entries already have a URL field and the issue URL is already in there, isn't that enough?

@edoceo
Copy link
Author

edoceo commented Mar 12, 2012

One would think, I sure thought so too. Before I submitted this bug I looked at the ICS output to verify that field is present and works as expected in many Calendaring applications. However, I'm using this ICS output to my Google Calendar which doesn't use that field. It's one of the on-going issues with Google Calendar - which, I'll admit, is a sub-par calendaring application - and yes they fully ignore users requests to properly implement iCal. So, that leaves it to us, with the only option being to embed that URI into the description field. That URI field is used by Google Calendar or their URI for the event - not the important/authoritative one that we provide. So; this fix is only required cause Google doesn't play nice.

I could use another Calendaring application but that Google ones ties so nicely to my phone so I can track my bugs. Of course that would be easier if Google would respect the feed we're providing - they seem to only check every few hours - and may (or may not) refresh after 24.

@thegcat
Copy link
Owner

thegcat commented Mar 12, 2012

Understood, I'll see about it.

@edoceo
Copy link
Author

edoceo commented Mar 15, 2012

Sweet! thank you.

thegcat added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2012
Added for clients that don't read the URL field
@thegcat
Copy link
Owner

thegcat commented Mar 15, 2012

Just added, I don't have an installation to test it anymore though, so I'll leave that to you.

@thegcat thegcat closed this as completed Mar 15, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant