We test whether people flexibly shift their sampling strategy for learning a functional relationship, based on the strategy’s perceived effectiveness. While general-purpose heuristics such as gathering information evenly across the environment may often approximate optimal sampling policies when opportunities for learning are sparse, these strategies may systematically fail when much of the environment is uninformative. Across several different classes of arbitrary smooth functions, participants (N = 89) made sampling choices that were initially consistent with a simple heuristic, but shifted their sampling strategy when this heuristic failed to be informative. People were subsequently more accurate at approximating the true function for smoother functions that can be more easily predicted by sampling evenly,
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Human Samples: function_020samples.csv
Human Prediction Data: function_020preds.csv
Clustering Results: function_020samplestrat.csv
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Clustering and Graphing: functions_2022.R
Sampling Policy Simulation and Gaussian Process Modelling: model_2022.ipynb
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________