-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*: Remove unnecessary configuration reload from ContentPathReloader
and improve its tests
#6496
Changes from all commits
273f714
5b89be6
19c5d18
7ee3542
097229e
9a5705d
043bdcb
560578d
b7028c6
47d711b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -57,13 +57,15 @@ func TestPathContentReloader(t *testing.T) { | |
testutil.Ok(t, pathContent.Rewrite([]byte("test modified again"))) | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
wantReloads: 1, | ||
wantReloads: 2, | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
name: "Chmod doesn't trigger reload", | ||
args: args{ | ||
runSteps: func(t *testing.T, testFile string, pathContent *staticPathContent) { | ||
testutil.Ok(t, os.Chmod(testFile, 0777)) | ||
testutil.Ok(t, os.Chmod(testFile, 0666)) | ||
testutil.Ok(t, os.Chmod(testFile, 0777)) | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
wantReloads: 0, | ||
|
@@ -79,7 +81,9 @@ func TestPathContentReloader(t *testing.T) { | |
}, | ||
} | ||
for _, tt := range tests { | ||
tt := tt | ||
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { | ||
t.Parallel() | ||
testFile := path.Join(t.TempDir(), "test") | ||
testutil.Ok(t, os.WriteFile(testFile, []byte("test"), 0666)) | ||
pathContent, err := NewStaticPathContent(testFile) | ||
|
@@ -98,6 +102,10 @@ func TestPathContentReloader(t *testing.T) { | |
testutil.Ok(t, err) | ||
|
||
tt.args.runSteps(t, testFile, pathContent) | ||
if tt.wantReloads == 0 { | ||
// Give things a little time to sync. The fs watcher events are heavily async and could be delayed. | ||
time.Sleep(1 * time.Second) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Crossposting from c6623f8#r120681785. Please check There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @GiedriusS I have some other follow ups to this part of the code and will include this suggested change for the next PR. 👍 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. But this loop will have a timeout though, as I don't want a test failure to end up with an infinite loop or rely on There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 👍 you can use runutil.Repeat with a context to achieve that There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @GiedriusS I actually have to keep the sleep there for one reason: a real scenario might have a delayed event from the fs and the test might pass if the assertion runs quickly before the event arrives... but would fail, as expected, if it had waited slightly more. I'm adding the repeat there though for all the other scenarios. |
||
} | ||
wg.Wait() | ||
testutil.Equals(t, tt.wantReloads, reloadCount) | ||
}) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does this trigger 2 reloads now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one triggers zero reload... see line 71 below.
The one above it triggers 2 reloads, which is truly what we expect, because the file is rewritten twice. Previously it could pass due to the code being much faster than the async fs watcher notification for the second rewrite of the file.